Laserfiche WebLink
Of the 4-5--14 intersections operating at an unacceptable level of service in the No Project <br />alternative, 44-10 of the intersections would require mitigation measures to improve conditions <br />to acceptable LOS (four intersections are located Downtown and are exempt from operating at <br />LOS D or better). <br />Comparing this alternative to the proposed General Plan shows that seven six intersections <br />would operate at a level of service worse than, and having delays greater than, the proposed <br />General Plan and would require mitigation beyond those outlined in the proposed General Plan. <br />(See Table 5-6.) Of the seven—,six, five of the intersections would need additional mitigation <br />measures to improve conditions to acceptable LOS (one intersection is located Downtown and is <br />exempt from operating at LOS D or better). <br />Note that this alternative would not cause any significant impacts at the intersection of <br />Stoneridge Drive at Johnson Drive, as the project would and thus would not have the potential <br />to result in a potentially significant impact that may not be mitigated. <br />Table 5-5 on page 5-11 of the DEIR has been changed to delete the Stoneridge Drive at El Charro Road <br />intersection, the last intersection listed on the table. <br />Table 5-6 on page 5-11 of the DEIR has been changed to delete the Stoneridge Drive at El Charro Road <br />intersection, the last intersection listed on the table. <br />On page 5-12 of the DEIR, the last bulleted item of the first paragraph has been deleted. <br />Table 5-7 on page 5-12 of the DEIR has been changed to delete the Stoneridge Drive at El Charro Road <br />intersection, the last intersection listed on the table. <br />On page 5-12 of the DEIR, the first sentence of the first paragraph after Table 5-7 has been modified as <br />follows: <br />The intersections shown in Table 5-8 identify the five intersections that would operate <br />acceptably with the No Project alternative but not with the proposed General Plan,�or to <br />miti ag tion. <br />Table 5-9 on page 5-16 of the DEIR has been changed to delete the Stoneridge Drive at El Charro Road <br />intersection, the last intersection listed on the table. <br />On page 5-16 of the DEIR, after Table 5-9 the first three paragraphs (continuing onto page 5-17 have <br />been modified as follow: <br />This discussion is based on a level -of -service analysis for all intersections prior to the inclusion <br />of mitigation measures. As part of this alternative, potentially significant effects due to level of <br />service would be mitigated for all intersections that are not located in the Downtown or at <br />any locations. The Dispersed Growth Alternative would result in 14 intersections <br />operating at an unacceptable level of service. All but two of these intersections would <br />operate at the same unacceptable level of service in the proposed General Plan (before <br />mitigations). Bern,, ..t Tsai Street operates .,t LOS E i the nM Peak hour i the Disperse <br />Growth Alter -native; however-, this inter-seetion would not need mitigation measures to ' , <br />the level of serviee to aeeeptable LOS (above LOS D) beeause the inter -section is a Downtew <br />interse .tio that : exerapt from o r.,ting .,t TOS D or better <br />2 <br />