My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2009-14, DRAFT PLEASANTON GENERAL PLAN
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC-2009-14, DRAFT PLEASANTON GENERAL PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2017 3:00:21 PM
Creation date
12/28/2017 2:53:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
PC-2009-14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The intersection of Stoneridge Drive at Johnson Drive, while still failing in LOS, would <br />operates at LOS E in the Dispersed Growth Alternative instead of LOS F in the proposed <br />General Plan. The mitigation to return Stoneridge Drive at Johnson Drive from LOS E to an <br />acceptable level of service is the same mitigation as in the proposed General Plan (see TR -1-24 <br />on page 3.4-22.) <br />Two One intersections, West Las Positas at Coronado Lane and Stoneridge Drive at El Charre <br />would operate at an acceptable level of service in the Dispersed Growth Alternative but not in <br />the proposed General Plan, prior to miti ag tion... . <br />On page 5-20 of the DEIR, the second paragraph under transportation has been modified as follows: <br />The discussion below is based on a level -of -service analysis for all intersections prior to the <br />inclusion of mitigation measures. As part of this alternative, potentially significant effects due <br />to level of service would be mitigated for all intersections that are not located in the Downtown <br />or atag tewgy locations. <br />The Concentrated Residential/Mixed Use Alternative, assuming the ITE data, would result in <br />Ay -19 intersections operating at an unacceptable level of service. Comparing this <br />alternative with the proposed General Plan shows that six -five intersections would operate at a <br />level of service worse than, and having delays greater than, the proposed General Plan, and one <br />intersection would change from an unacceptable operation level to acceptable. Of the six -five, <br />twee -two are located within the Downtown and are exempt from operating at LOS D or better, <br />and therefore would not require measures to mitigate the impacts. One intersection is a <br />gateway intersection and, as wit the proposed General Plan, would not be required to improve <br />its operation to LOS D or better. Thisatg eway intersection (East Bound I-580 off -ramp to <br />Santa Rita Road) could result in a new potentially significant effect that may not be mitigated. <br />Two other intersections would need include the following additional mitigation measures to <br />improve conditions to an acceptable LOS. <br />Table 5-10 on page 5-21 of the DEIR has been changed to delete the Stoneridge Drive at El Charro <br />Road intersection, the last intersection listed on the table. <br />On page 5-22 of the DEIR, the fourth paragraph has been modified as follows: <br />Intersection operations for the other study intersections would generally operate under similar <br />conditions with either the Concentrated Residential/Mixed Use Alternative or the proposed <br />General Plan. As such, the Concentrated Residential/Mixed Use Alternative would result in <br />greater impacts than would occur under the proposed General Plan with one more intersection <br />resulting in a potentially significant impact than the project. <br />CHANGES TO THE RESPONSES TO COMMENTS DOCUMENT <br />Chapter 5 <br />On page 5-7, the third paragraph has been modified as follows: <br />Pages 3.2-21 and 22 the mitigation measures after TR -1.1 are revised as follows (Response to <br />Comments 5.1 and 23. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.