Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT B <br />EIR ERRATA <br />INTRODUCTION <br />Since publication of the Final Environmental Impact Report, Responses to Comments for the Proposed <br />Pleasanton General Plan 2005-2025, Planning Division staff identified minor errors in the EIR text. <br />These errors have been fixed and are shown as changes with the location of the changes identified. <br />Revised or new language is underlined. Deleted language is indicated by strikeover (r*4ever-) <br />CHANGES TO THE DRAFT EIR <br />Chapter 5 <br />Table 5-4 on page 5-8 has been changed as follows to be consistent with the text on pages 5-14 to 5-15 <br />of the DEIR: <br />[Partial] Table 5-4 <br />Project Alternatives — Com parison of Impacts <br />Proposed Dispersed Concentrated <br />General No Project Growth Residential/Mixed <br />Environmental Issue Plan Alternative Alternative Use Alternative <br />Noise <br />Expose persons to or generate noise <br />LTS <br />LTS <br />LTS <br />LTS <br />levels in excess of the exterior noise <br />standards <br />Expose persons to or generate noise <br />LTS <br />LTS <br />LTS <br />LTS <br />levels in excess of the interior noise <br />standards <br />Create a substantial temporary or <br />LTS <br />PS LTS <br />LTS <br />LTS <br />periodic increase in ambient <br />construction noise levels in the <br />project vicinity <br />Expose persons to or generate <br />LTS <br />PSI-Ts <br />LTS <br />LTS <br />excessive groundborne vibration <br />The last three paragraphs on page 5-10 of the DEIR are modified as follows: <br />Fifteen -Fourteen intersections do not meet the level of service standard in the No Project <br />alternative. The proposed General Plan also contains 4&-14 intersections that fail to meet the <br />level of service standard. Ten Nine of the ween -fourteen failing intersections are the same <br />intersections in the No Project alternative and proposed General Plan. There are five new <br />intersections identified in the No Project alternative that would require mitigation, and with the <br />No Project alternative, five proposed General Plan intersection mitigations would no longer be <br />necessary. <br />