PC-2008-61, PUD-85-09, SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING

II. Scope of Determination Made By Planning Commission 5. Pursuant to §§ 18.12.050 through 18.12.070 of the City's Municipal Code, Sunrise submitted an application for a Zoning Certificate to confirm that its submitted plans substantially conformed to the development standards set forth in PUD -85-09, as required by Condition of Approval No. 1 of PUD -85-09. 6. At a duly noticed public hearing on June 11, 2008, the Planning Commission reviewed the application for a Zoning Certificate and received comments from the public. 7. At the June 11, 2008 hearing, the Planning Commission requested that the applicant engage with neighbors of the Project Site and work on refinements to the submitted plans. In particular, comments from the Planning Commission focused on ensuring that: (a) the height and mass of the building do not exceed the intended development standards of PUD -85-09; and (b) the intensity of use of the proposed building does not exceed what was intended by PUD -85-09, taking into account current regulations governing the provision of care to seniors. 8. Sunrise has participated actively in several facilitation sessions with a facilitator, the Director of Community Development, and neighborhood representatives who conveyed the interests of the neighbors in areas surrounding the Project Site. During the course of these sessions, Sunrise has refined the submitted plans to both respond to neighborhood comments about the design and functionality of the proposed facility while simultaneously bringing the plans into greater conformity with the approved PUD -85-09 project in response to direction by the Planning Commission. 9. Sunrise submitted a refined set of plans and supporting documentation, Exhibit A. The sole issue before the Planning Commission is the ministerial determination of whether the Project as set forth in the Refined Submittal substantially conforms to the minimum design guidelines and development standards of the Planned Unit Development zoning for the site (PUD -85-09). III. The Refined Submittal Substantially Conforms to PUD -85-09 The height and massing of the building as set forth in the Refined Submittal substantially conforms to the City's planned development zoning approval for the Project Site. 10. PUD -85-09 was described in approval documents as a two- and three-story structure. In addition, the footprint of the structure was reflected on a site plan indicating minimum setbacks of 16 feet from Foothill Road, 75 feet from Stoneridge Drive, 17 feet from Pleasant Hill Road, and 15 feet from the Moller Park. (All setbacks are measured from the property line.) oil