My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 17976
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
RES 17976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2017 9:31:19 AM
Creation date
11/13/2017 4:40:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
17976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
potential growth could significantly affect the environment in some other way. <br /> Chapter 6, Section A of the Draft SEIR provides an analysis of growth-inducing <br /> effects of the proposed Zone, as required by CEQA Guidelines §15126.2(d). With the exception of <br /> the potential development of a minor amount of senior housing, the proposed Zone would not <br /> directly induce substantial population growth. As discussed in the SEIR,population growth that <br /> could be induced as a consequence of new employees working with the area of the Zone moving to <br /> the City would not be substantial;therefore,the proposed Zone is not likely to induce substantial <br /> indirect population growth. In addition,the area of the proposed Zone is currently served by water, <br /> sanitary sewer, stormwater, and other roadway and utility infrastructure, and any needed upgrades to <br /> these systems would not be likely to be of a scale that would induce substantial population growth. <br /> Improvements to local roadways and I-680 would be undertaken to accommodate the proposed <br /> Zone, and would likewise not be likely to stimulate substantial further growth in the area. <br /> Accordingly,the City Council finds that the proposed Zone effects related to <br /> indirectly facilitating population growth would be minor, and that the Project's benefits <br /> substantially outweigh the eight significant and unavoidable impacts as demonstrated below in the <br /> Statement of Overriding Considerations. <br /> IL STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS <br /> Pursuant to Public Resources Code §21081 and CEQA Guidelines §15093, the City <br /> Council has balanced the economic, legal, social,technological, and other benefits of the proposed <br /> Zone against the Zone's eight significant and unavoidable impacts and has adopted all feasible <br /> mitigation measures. The City Council has also examined three potentially feasible alternatives to <br /> the proposed Zone, neither of which are feasible in that they would not accomplish the City's basic <br /> objectives for the proposed Zone to a satisfactory extent(the substantial benefits articulated by the <br /> City in its objectives would not be likely to be provided under the alternatives). The City has <br /> adopted mitigation measures that reduce, to the extent feasible, the significant environmental <br /> effects of the Project. <br /> The City Council hereby adopts and makes the following Statement of Overriding <br /> Considerations regarding the significant and unavoidable impacts of the proposed Zone and the <br /> anticipated economic, legal, social,technological, and other benefits of the Zone. <br /> A. Significant and Unavoidable Impacts <br /> Based on information contained in the record and in the SEIR, the City Council has <br /> determined that the proposed Zone would result in significant and unavoidable impacts to: (1) air <br /> quality due to emissions of NOx and PM10 that would results from operation of uses that would be <br /> developed within the area of the proposed Zone, and that would exceed BAAQMD significance <br /> thresholds; and (2)traffic and transportation due to the possibility of substantial increases in traffic <br /> to local study intersections under Existing plus Project conditions,Near-term plus Project <br /> conditions, and Far-term(Cumulative) plus Project conditions; and to freeway ramps at <br /> merge/diverge areas under Existing plus Project conditions and Far-term(Cumulative)plus <br /> Project conditions. <br /> Table 2 presented under I.K.2, above, illustrates the impacts to Transportation and <br /> 60 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.