My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 17976
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
RES 17976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2017 9:31:19 AM
Creation date
11/13/2017 4:40:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
17976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7. Geology and Soils <br /> Impact 4.E-4a: The proposed Zone would not result in any direct or cumulatively <br /> considerable significant adverse impacts to geological resources exposing people or structures to <br /> potential substantial adverse effects within the proposed Zone, including the risk of loss, injury, or <br /> death involving: <br /> i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, <br /> ii) Strong seismic ground shaking, <br /> iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction, or <br /> • iv) Landslides. <br /> Impact 4.E-4b: The proposed Zone would not result in substantial soil erosion or the <br /> loss of topsoil such that a significant adverse impact would occur. <br /> Impact 4.E-4c: The proposed Zone would not be located on a geologic unit or soil that <br /> is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the proposed Zone such that a significant <br /> adverse impact would occur. <br /> Impact 4.E-4d: The proposed Zone would not be located on expansive soil such that a <br /> significant adverse impact would occur. <br /> (Draft SEIR,pp. 4.E-20 to 4.E-21) <br /> In addition, development facilitated by the proposed Zone would not result in the loss <br /> of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of <br /> the state; and would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource <br /> recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan; therefore, the <br /> proposed Zone would have no impact on mineral resources. <br /> (Draft SEIR,p. 6-7) <br /> 8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br /> Impacts 4.E-3a: The proposed Zone would not generate greenhouse gas emissions, <br /> either directly or indirectly,that would have a significant impact on the environment. <br /> Impacts 4.E-3b: The proposed Zone would not conflict with an applicable plan, <br /> policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. <br /> (Draft SEIR,pp. 4.E-24 to 4.E-26) <br /> 9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br /> Impact 4.E-5a: The proposed Zone would not create a significant hazard to the <br /> public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. <br /> Impact 4.E-5e: The proposed Zone would not impair implementation of or <br /> physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. <br /> Impact 4.E-5f: The proposed Zone would not expose people or structures to a <br /> 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.