My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 17976
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
RES 17976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2017 9:31:19 AM
Creation date
11/13/2017 4:40:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
17976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. Transportation and Traffic <br /> Impact 4.D-4: Development facilitated by the proposed Zone would affect levels <br /> of service on mainline freeway segments under Existing plus Project conditions,but not to an <br /> extent that a significant impact would occur. (Draft SEIR,pp. 4.D-50 to 4.D-52) <br /> Impact 4.D-6: Development facilitated by the proposed Zone would affect levels <br /> of service on mainline freeway segments under Far-term (Cumulative)plus Project conditions, <br /> but not to an extent that a significant impact would occur. (Draft SEIR,p. 4.D-53) <br /> Impact 4.D-8: Development facilitated by the proposed Zone would have an <br /> impact on Metropolitan Transportation System roadways identified in the Congestion <br /> Management Plan, including freeways, major arterials, and other major roadways as designated <br /> by the Alameda CTC,but not to an extent that a significant impact would occur. (Draft SEIR, pp. <br /> 4.D-56 to 4.D-57) <br /> Impact 4.D-10: Development facilitated by the proposed Zone would not result in <br /> inadequate access for emergency vehicles. (Draft SEIR,pp. 4.D-60 to 4.D-65) <br /> Impact 4.D-13: Development facilitated by the proposed Zone would generate <br /> temporary increases in traffic volume and temporary effects on transportation conditions during <br /> construction activities, but not to an extent that a significant impact would occur. (Draft SEIR, <br /> pp. 4.D-67 to 4.D-68) <br /> 5. Biological Resources <br /> Impact 4.E-lb: The proposed Zone would not have substantial adverse impacts on <br /> any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community within the proposed Zone. <br /> Impact 4.E-1d: The proposed Zone would not interfere substantially with the <br /> movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native <br /> resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. <br /> Impact 4.E-le: The proposed Zone would not conflict with any local policies or <br /> ordinances protecting biological resources. <br /> Impact 4.E-lf: The proposed Zone would not conflict with the provisions of an <br /> adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved <br /> local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. <br /> (Draft SEIR,pp. 4.E-9 to 4.E-14) <br /> 6. Cultural Resources <br /> Impact 4.E-2a: The proposed Zone would not cause a substantial adverse change in <br /> the significance of a historical resource, as defined in CEQA Guidelines §15064.5. <br /> (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.E-18 to 4.E-19) <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.