Laserfiche WebLink
- r <br /> significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. <br /> (Draft SEIR,pp. 4.E-27 to 4.E-28) <br /> 10. Hydrology and Water Quality. <br /> Impact 4.E-6a: The proposed Zone would not violate any water quality standards <br /> or waste discharge requirements. <br /> Impact 4.E-6b: The proposed Zone would not substantially deplete groundwater <br /> supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. <br /> Impact 4.E-6c: The proposed Zone would not substantially alter existing drainage <br /> patterns. <br /> Impact 4.E-6d: The proposed Zone would not create or contribute runoff water <br /> which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide <br /> substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. <br /> Impact 4.E-6e: The proposed Zone would not otherwise substantially degrade <br /> water quality. <br /> Impact 4.E-6f: The proposed Zone would not place structures within a 100-year <br /> flood hazard area which would impede or redirect flood flows. <br /> Impact 4.E-6g: The proposed Zone would not expose people or structures to a <br /> significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the <br /> failure of a levee or dam. <br /> (Draft SEIR,pp. 4.E-29 to 4.E-31) <br /> 11. Land Use and Planning <br /> Impact 4.E-7a: The proposed Zone would not physically divide an established <br /> community. <br /> Impact 4.E-7b: The proposed Zone would not conflict with any applicable land use <br /> plan, policy, or regulation. <br /> Impact 4.E-7c: The proposed Zone would not conflict with any applicable habitat <br /> conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. <br /> (Draft SEIR,pp. 4.E-31 to 4.E-32) <br /> In addition,the proposed Zone would not directly or indirectly convert Prime <br /> Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use; would <br /> not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract; and would not <br /> involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could <br /> result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use, and therefore would have no impact on <br /> agricultural resources. Likewise,the EDZ would not cause rezoning of forest land,timberland, or <br /> timberland-zoned Timberland Production, and,therefore, development facilitated by the proposed <br /> 15 <br />