My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-98-19
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
PC-98-19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:32:59 AM
Creation date
12/16/2003 9:53:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/25/1998
DOCUMENT NO
PC-98-19
DOCUMENT NAME
RZ-97-07
NOTES
CITY OF PLEASANTON
NOTES 3
AMEND PMC/WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITIES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />5. A map based on drive tests (or similar engineering data) at the proposed site <br />and its vicinity showing the estimated coverage area for the proposed personal wireless <br />service facility. As used herein, drive tests are field tests to demonstrate the coverage of a <br />proposed antenna in which one person holds a transmitter at the proposed site and another <br />drives away from the site with a receiver to determine the outer perimeter ofthe radio <br />signals that can be transmitted from the site. <br /> <br />6. A "mock-up" of the proposed personal wireless service facility at the proposed <br />facility location using materials and colors that resemble the proposed facility. <br /> <br />7. A letter stating, wherever technically feasible, how the facilities have been <br />design to allow co-location of other carriers. <br /> <br />8. A letter stating specifically the reasons for not co-locating on any existing <br />personal wireless service facility tower or at any site with existing antennas within the <br />City. The reasons for not co-locating may include letters from personal wireless service <br />providers with existing facilities stating reasons for not permitting co-location, or <br />evidence that personal wireless service providers have not responded, or, if the reasons <br />for refusal to co-locate are structural, the structural calculations for review by the <br />Planning Department. <br /> <br />9. Noise impact analysis. <br /> <br />10. A letter to the Zoning Administrator which describes in detail the <br />maintenance program for the facilities. <br /> <br />11. Written proof of the availability of any required irrigation facilities on site <br />prior to permit issuance. This may be in the form of a letter from the owner of the land <br />allowing the personal wireless service provider the use of required water facilities for <br />landscaping of all facilities. <br /> <br />18.110.050 Locational Standards <br /> <br />A. A personal wireless service facility shall be a permitted use in any zoning <br />district only if it complies with the locational standards stated in this Section and with all <br />regulations provided in this Chapter. <br /> <br />B. A personal wireless service facility shall not be located in any residential or <br />agricultural zoning district or in a Planned Unit Development with a residential or <br />agricultural zoning designation unless all of the following criteria are met: <br /> <br />I. The residential zoning district, agricultural zoning district, or Planned Unit <br />Development is developed, has an approved development plan, or is designated as a <br />Public and Institutional land use in the General Plan. <br /> <br />RZ-97-7 <br />3/25/98 <br />RZ977A4.sam/RKE <br /> <br />Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.