My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
110717
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 11:39:33 AM
Creation date
11/1/2017 11:12:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Johnson Drive EDZ <br />Use of TIF for Traffic Impact Mitigation <br />Prepared by Matt Sullivan <br />9/8/17 <br />The city is proposing to use the TIF fund to mitigate the "direct" roadway improvements needed for the <br />JDEZ project. They are proposing to utilize $6.4 million from the existing fund for the new 1-680 NB <br />onramp lane from Stoneridge Drive, and a $3.7 million TIF payment from Costco to offset Johnson Drive <br />direct roadway improvements. <br />Analysis of this proposal follows. <br />1998 TIF Study (attached): <br />From page 1: <br />"Recognizing these changes, the proposed traffic fee will require that each new development pay its <br />fair share through fees for needed City-wide traffic improvements, while still requiring that individual <br />development projects construct those improvements which are directly related to their project." <br />From page 3: <br />"Those street improvements which are directly adjacent or related to serving a specific new <br />development are designated as "Direct Development", and are not included in the proposed fee. These <br />costs are assigned directly to the specific development responsible for its construction." <br />The current city proposal is to use the fees to offset direct improvements. Per this statement the <br />development should pay both fees and fund the direct improvements. <br />From the 2006 General Plan Circulation Element, Policy 1: <br />Program 1.1: Require new developments to pay for their fair share of planned roadway <br />improvement costs. <br />Program 1.2: Update the Traffic Development Fee study consistent with improvements needed <br />to implement the General Plan circulation system. <br />This again indicates that the development should pay their share of direct improvement costs, and <br />contribute to a fee for city-wide circulation improvements. <br />2010 TIF Nexus Study (attached) <br />From the Introduction: <br />"This report provides an updated Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) study for the City of Pleasanton. It <br />provides the list of proposed projects and the technical basis for establishing the required nexus <br />between anticipated future development in the City of Pleasanton and the need for local transportation <br />facilities. The specific tasks performed in preparing this analysis and their results are summarized below. <br />The City's TIF program was established in 1998. The TIF program is updated periodically to respond to <br />changing conditions and to assure that traffic impact fees support the transportation improvements <br />necessary to accommodate new development." <br />P14-0852 and PUD -105, JDEDZ - Public Comments Provided for October 11, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting 60 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.