My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
110717
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 11:39:33 AM
Creation date
11/1/2017 11:12:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From Purpose of Study: <br />"The purpose of this study is to update the City's current TIF and to demonstrate a reasonable <br />relationship between the calculated fee amount and the development land uses on which the fees are <br />imposed, as required by AB 1600. The bill requires that all public agencies satisfy the following <br />requirements when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval for a <br />development project: <br />o Identify the purpose of the fee <br />• Identify the uses to which the fee will be applied <br />o Establish a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development <br />on which the fee is assessed <br />o Establish a relationship between the need for the facility and the type of development <br />project on which the fee is assessed <br />• Establish a reasonable relationship between the fee amount and the cost of the public <br />facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is <br />imposed." <br />TIF funds can only be applied to projects listed in the nexus study. The Stoneridge NB I-680 lane is not <br />listed in the 2010 study as an eligible project. It was included in the 1998 study, but a new nexus study <br />was performed for 2010 which indicates it no longer qualifies. There is no mechanism for "rolling over" <br />previously identified projects, except for Existing Deficiencies which are listed on page 3. <br />Conclusion <br />The city is proposing to use TIF funds that are intended for needed City-wide traffic improvements to <br />fund improvements which are directly related to their project. This is an illegitimate use of TIF funds <br />essentially diverting public money from needed city-wide projects to mitigate direct project impacts. <br />Italics mine. <br />P14-0852 and PUD -105, JDEDZ - Public Comments Provided for October 11, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting 61 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.