Laserfiche WebLink
DSEIR Comments 11/21/15 <br />Submitted by Matt Sullivan <br />o The effect that the project would have on sales loss to existing, similar businesses in <br />Pleasanton. This should include downtown an other areas of Pleasanton <br />o A forecast of existing business closures and the resulting "urban decay" caused by the <br />EDZ <br />o Losses of wages and benefits to workers at existing businesses that are displaced by the <br />new businesses in the EDZ <br />o An analysis of profits leaving the community from the new corporate businesses as <br />compared to existing businesses <br />7. The analysis of the projects compliance with the Pleasanton Climate Action Plan (CAP) is flawed <br />and inadequate. The DSEIR anticipates future, yet to be implemented state policies from AB=32 <br />to allow Pleasanton to meet its GHG emissions reductions targets as outlined in the CAP. <br />Relying on the potential future reductions is speculative at best and cannot be accurately <br />quantified. The DSEIR should evaluate the forecasted GHG emissions from this project against a <br />baseline of the existing zoning as well as the DSEIR project alternatives. This would provide an <br />accurate impact of the project related to achieving the emissions reductions targets of the CAP. <br />3 <br />P14-0852 and PUD -105, JDEDZ - Public Comments Provided for October 11, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting 59 <br />