My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
110717
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 11:39:33 AM
Creation date
11/1/2017 11:12:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JDEDZ PROJECT REVIEW <br />SEPTEMBER 2017 <br />(estimated by ALH at just $681,000 per year). Including the category in a study of retail again <br />serves to dilute the apparent impact of Costco. <br />In future years, the JDEDZ is likely to include any number of eating and drinking establishments. <br />This category, however, is generally analyzed separately from conventional retail with very good <br />reason: food and beverage service is a service, not a retail sector, and operates in a market <br />very different from storefront retail. <br />As depicted in the Figure <br />7, restaurants have far <br />outperformed retailers <br />in recent years, while <br />brick and mortar <br />retailers have lost <br />ground as a share of <br />overall retail and even <br />relative to population <br />growth. As a result, <br />mixing restaurants and <br />bars into a retail <br />dataset masks negative <br />trends impacting retail <br />stores. <br />Because the food and <br />beverage sector is <br />growing, it is of little <br />concern that the <br />JDEDZ might introduce <br />additional restaurant Source: US Census Bureau, Economic Census <br />locations. And, as with smaller retail locations, restaurants could be developed in the EDZ <br />without the expenditure of millions in infrastructure improvements. <br />Figure 7 <br />RETAIL vs RESTAURANT MARKET CHANGES, 1997-2012 <br />50.0% <br />40.0% <br />30.0% <br />20.0% <br />10.0% <br />0.0% <br />-10.0% <br />Li I <br />Establishments <br />Sales (Inflation Adjusted) Employees <br />■ Brick and Mortar Retail ■AII Retail ■ Restaurants and Bars <br />Future Demand Projections Ignore Current Retail Trends <br />Having established an inflated retail demand estimate of 25% of household income, ALH carries <br />that forward among all new households projected in the market area. Beyond the <br />overstatement of household retail demand demonstrated above, Civic Economics questions the <br />projection that any rate of household retail demand will be flat into the future, at least in regard <br />to storefront retail demand. <br />The ALH Economic Impact Study makes no reference to the rise of online retailing and its <br />impact on the market for bricks and mortar retailers, ignoring the most discussed and studied <br />aspect of retail economics of the last few years. <br />Online retail is made up of non -store retailers like Amazon, as well as the online efforts of <br />traditional retailers like Macy's and Home Depot. These sales generate little demand for local <br />retail square footage, which is what the ALH study seeks to forecast. As Figure 8 reveals, <br />forecasts of the market for local storefront retail must account for the ever-increasing diversion <br />of sales from shops to distribution centers. <br />Civic Economics 15 <br />P14-0852 and PUD -105, JDEDZ - Public Comments Provided for October 11, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting 53 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.