Laserfiche WebLink
JDEDZ PROJECT REVIEW <br />SEPTEMBER 2017 <br />IV: IMPACT ON PLEASANTON RETAIL MARKET <br />This final review seeks to place the proposed JDEDZ retail developments in the context of the <br />Pleasanton retail market. We focus, as above, on the Costco store, as it is the driver of most of <br />retail sales at the site and of the need to invest substantially in transportation infrastructure to <br />serve the site. <br />The city previously commissioned ALH Urban & Regional Economics prepare an Economic <br />Impact Study of the JDEDZ, which included a market study component. Given the tight time <br />frame of our work, Civic Economics has limited this phase to a review of the ALH study to <br />ascertain whether its methodology and findings are sound with respect to this specific project. <br />ALH forecasts that Costco and other JDEDZ retailers will not substantially impact other <br />Pleasanton retailers, concluding that the development is almost entirely additive to the local <br />market and thus to municipal sales tax collections. This conclusion leads to the finding that the <br />proposal will not contribute to urban decay, as defined in California law. However, two aspects <br />of that analysis strike us as problematic: (1) It overestimates household consumer demand <br />today and into the future by including irrelevant segments in the analysis and (2) it ignores <br />current retail trends. <br />Consumer Demand Estimates are Overstated <br />ALH systematically overestimates household demand for relevant retail goods. <br />ALH builds its local market analysis on the assumption that Pleasanton residents spend 25% of <br />household income on retail goods, a figure derived from three sources: the Census Bureau's <br />Consumer Expenditure Survey for spending patterns, the California Board of Equalization for <br />sales tax information, and the Association of Bay Area Governments for population forecasts. <br />The analysis is straightforward and reasonable on the surface. The goal was to estimate the <br />current demand for retail goods impacted by the JDEDZ project, using current household <br />income and retail spending, then carry that estimate into the future to model the local retail <br />economy through the life of the JDEDZ project. <br />The ALH analysis, though, includes two categories of spending that we contend should have <br />been excluded from the dataset: motor vehicle sales and eating and drinking establishments. <br />Removing those categories reduces the predicted share of household income spent on relevant <br />retail sectors from AHL's 25% to 19.1%. That, in turn, reduces ALH's projected population - <br />driven increase in local retail demand through 2028 from $222.8 million to $172.2 million (Figure <br />6). <br />As a result of this overstatement of current and future market demand, the ALH report thus <br />overstates the ability of the Pleasanton retail market to absorb sales from Costco and other <br />retailers in the JDEDZ without harmful impact. Moreover, as discussed below, holding even this <br />lower share of income static ignores recent retail trends, compounding the overstatement <br />through the years. <br />Civic Economics 13 <br />P14-0852 and PUD -105, JDEDZ - Public Comments Provided for October 11, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting 51 <br />