My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
110717
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 11:39:33 AM
Creation date
11/1/2017 11:12:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JDEDZ PROJECT REVIEW <br />SEPTEMBER 2017 <br />throughout the city if the Costco siting didn't require that expenditure to make the JDEDZ site <br />feasible. <br />Costco TIF Charges: $3.7 million <br />The second pool of TIF related funds dedicated to the Costco project comes from TIF fees <br />levied on the Costco project itself. Fees on specific projects are governed by legislation and <br />extensive case law; in the present case, Civic Economics accepts the city's assertion that $3.7 <br />million is an appropriate TIF for the Costco project. <br />According to the city's original technical report on the fee, the purpose of local TIF funds in <br />California is "to assure that all future development contributes its fair share towards the cost of <br />traffic improvements necessary for build -out of the General Plan ... [T]he proposed traffic fee <br />will require that each new development pay its fair share through fees needed for City-wide <br />traffic improvements will still requiring that individual development projects construct those <br />improvements which are directly related to their project." <br />In the present case, Costco will be assessed a TIF in the amount of $3.7 million, but instead of <br />going into the TIF fund to mitigate Costco's share of traffic growth off-site, that money will be <br />spent closer to the site, arguably including improvements that are directly related to the project. <br />Civic Economics is in no position to opine on the legality of this proposed expenditure and <br />recommends that interested citizens review the matter with local counsel. However, legality <br />aside, this $3.7. million might well be available for other needed transportation projects <br />throughout the city if project -related costs were identified more conservatively or if the Costco <br />were constructed at a site with fewer infrastructure needs. <br />Combined TIF Diversion: $10.1 million <br />Combined, these two expenditures of TIF funds, $6.4 million from the existing fund paid into by <br />all the other developments that preceded the Costco and $3.7 million from the Costco project <br />itself, combine to divert millions of dollars from previously transportation improvement projects <br />throughout the City of Pleasanton. Instead, this $10.1 million will be expended in making the <br />JDEDZ site a viable one for the Costco. <br />Civic Economics 12 <br />P14-0852 and PUD -105, JDEDZ - Public Comments Provided for October 11, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting 50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.