My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
110717
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 11:39:33 AM
Creation date
11/1/2017 11:12:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JDEDZ PROJECT REVIEW <br />SEPTEMBER 2017 <br />III: OTHER PROJECT FINANCING <br />In addition to the Sales Tax Sharing Agreement analyzed above, the JDEDZ relies on additional <br />funding sources. Two of those are noteworthy here as they impact the availability of capital <br />improvement funds for transportation projects elsewhere in the city, the Traffic Impact Fee. <br />Since 1998, the City of Pleasanton has maintained a TIF fund for transportation needs <br />throughout the city. The guiding document for the program was updated in 2010. The <br />proposed funding for the Costco component of the JDEDZ calls on TIF for two distinct pools of <br />money: <br />1. $6.4 million from existing TIF funds for Stoneridge Drive and 1-680 onramp <br />improvements <br />2. $3.7 million from Costco's project -specific TIF payment <br />We will briefly discuss each of these sources separately. <br />Stoneridge Drive and 1-680 Onramp Improvements: $6.4 million <br />The primary access point to the Costco will be on Johnson Drive north from Stoneridge Drive. <br />The project calls for an expansion of a curved portion of Johnson Drive to seven lanes to <br />accommodate customers and suppliers to the Costco site. The alternative for Costco access is <br />a much longer stretch of Johnson Drive to the north and east, using Owens Drive and Clorox <br />Way to access Hopyard Road, a major thoroughfare. To facilitate anticipated Costco traffic from <br />the south, the project calls for widening Stoneridge to feed both the new Johnson Drive lanes <br />and a new second onramp lane to northbound 1-680. <br />The city proposes to fund this improvement (both the Stoneridge widening and the second <br />onramp lane it will feed) using existing TIF funds, generated by other developments through the <br />years. However, the appropriateness of this allocation of TIF money is problematic. <br />First, the current Traffic Impact Fee and Nexus Report (2010, TJKM Transportation <br />Consultants), does not appear to include the Stoneridge onramp in the TIF spending plan. It <br />includes a widening of Stoneridge over 1-680 (estimated at $4.65 million in 2010) and a modest <br />reworking of the Stoneridge -Johnson intersection ($0.4 million). <br />Interestingly, the 1998 iteration of the TIF "Development Fee Project List" did include an <br />estimated $8 million expenditure for 1-680 onramps from Stoneridge, but this line item was <br />apparently discarded in the 2010 update. <br />Second, the current Capital Improvement Program for the city (2017/18 — 2020/21) does <br />include a $6.4 million item specifically for the JDEDZ described as "Stoneridge Drive and 1-680 <br />Northbound Widening." That project is included in a list and discussion of "City Council CIP <br />Priority Projects." The text there is clear in stating that, "in the event the JDEDZ is not approved <br />the reserve would return to fund balance to be reprogrammed for other General Plan eligible <br />projects." In other words, should the Costco and JDEDZ not go forward, there would be no <br />need for the onramp expansion through at least FY 2020/21. <br />Civic Economics is in no position to opine on the legality of this proposed expenditure and <br />recommends that interested citizens review the matter with local counsel. However, legality <br />aside, this $6.4 million would be made available for other needed transportation projects <br />Civic Economics 11 <br />P14-0852 and PUD -105, JDEDZ - Public Comments Provided for October 11, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.