Laserfiche WebLink
Jim Van Dyke, thirty year resident and business owner, commented on the angry communication <br /> he has seen regarding Owens Drive. He shared there were important safety improvements that <br /> went in when Owens Drive was initially narrows. They were put in for traffic calming and there is <br /> still a concern for safety, including bicycle safety. The social media commentary on this matter <br /> does not seem to include any safety elements. He suggested the City Council support air quality, <br /> through promoting the use of bicycling and bicycle safety, as well as community connectedness. <br /> Mayor Thorne noted that this item is not on the agenda and the Council cannot respond at this <br /> time. City Manager Fialho responded the City Council requested that City staff collect data. This <br /> matter should return to the City Council in the October/November time frame and City staff will <br /> ensure the community is properly noticed. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> 15. (a) Introduction of an ordinance to amend the Chapter 18.110 (Personal Wireless Service <br /> Facilities) of the Pleasanton Municipal Code to allow for small-cell-wireless systems in the <br /> Hacienda Business Park where the systems are concealed <br /> (b) Approve amendment to four maintenance agreements between the City and the Hacienda <br /> Business Park Owners Association to extend the terms of those agreements and to allow for <br /> revenue share for small-cell-wireless systems to be located in street lights in the Hacienda <br /> Business Park <br /> Assistant City Attorney Julie Harryman presented a staff report addressing background <br /> including contacts with the Association. The City and the Association partnered to select the <br /> best aesthetic design for small-cell wireless solutions and agreed upon the "smart pole." Photo <br /> simulations were presented. The Code Amendment will only apply in this particular area. <br /> Carriers may lease space inside each smart pole and the location placement will be subject to <br /> the Community Development Director's determination and require a permit. <br /> Mayor Thorne inquired whether pending legislation will impact this project in terms of equipment <br /> placement on the outside of each pole. Assistant City Attorney Harryman noted the City has <br /> design review authority through the Municipal Code and wireless cannot be placed in residential <br /> zones. <br /> Mark Jones, representing the smart pole vendor, Phillips, provided the specifications and <br /> placement of the new smart poles, including their larger base width in order to accommodate <br /> internal equipment, replacing 300 of the existing 430 poles due to ADA, OSHA, and other <br /> restrictions, and noted that each proposed location has been certified. The carrier's equipment, <br /> as well as the vendor's equipment, will be completely concealed within each unit. There are no <br /> lease rights on the outside of the pole. <br /> Councilmember Narum questioned whether multiple carriers can place equipment within the <br /> same pole. Mr. Jones responded that the poles are "future-proofed," to accommodate <br /> equipment now and in the future and can be easily adapted for multiple carriers. At this time, it <br /> is foreseeable that there will only be one carrier per pole and it is the City's choice regarding <br /> which carrier to enter into an agreement. <br /> Councilmember Olson asked Mr. Jones to elaborate on the maintenance of the smart poles. Mr. <br /> Jones confirmed they are much easier and less costly to maintain, and most diagnostics can be <br /> conducted remotely. Upgrades to the equipment can be done from the base and there is also a <br /> safety disconnect from power in the base. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 7 September 5, 2017 <br />