My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 121416
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 121416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:57:43 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:50:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/14/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Nagler: Second. <br />Beaudin: Do you want to add the 1,000 foot radius if a Minor Use Permit kicks up to the <br />Planning Commission? <br />Commissioner Balch: Do you want us to because I would but... okay, so amended. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Second as amended. <br />Commissioner Balch moved to recommend approval of Case P16 -1418, per staff <br />recommendation with the following modifications: (1) under section 18.124.200, <br />add section "Ii" that indicates a Minor CUP cannot be processed as a result of <br />the PUD Minor Modification until the effective date of the PUD Minor Modification; <br />(2) add a footnote the Table 18.44.080 to require a CUP for retail uses that exceed <br />7,500 square feet and are located within the Downtown Specific Plan area; (3) <br />modify the threshold for a CUP for retail uses outside the Downtown Specific <br />Plan area to be 55,000 square feet instead of 60,000 square feet; (4) discard <br />proposed modifications to section 18.44.030 and retain existing language; (5) add <br />language that indicates a Minor CUP that is subject to review by the Planning <br />Commission will be noticed to property owners and occupants within 1,000 feet <br />of the exterior boundaries of the property on which the minor conditional use <br />permit is proposed; and (6) strongly recommend the zoning designations be <br />spelled out in the heading of Table 18.44.080. <br />Commissioner Nagler seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Allen, Balch, Nagler, O'Connor, and Chair Ritter <br />NOES: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />RECUSED: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />Resolution No. PC- 2016 -34 approving Case P16 -1418 was entered and adopted as <br />motioned. <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />Chair Ritter: I think there were some Commission members who went to a training? Do <br />we bring that up here? <br />Beaudin: This is the Planning Commission section, but I just wanted to tee it up a bit. <br />We went to Sonoma State University for Planning Commissioner training on Saturday, <br />December 3rd. It was a four -hour training session with three topics. The first topic was a <br />talk given by Woodie Tescher who talked about updating General Plans. The second <br />was Miriam Chion from ABAG and she was talking about local plans and regional <br />strategies and how the regional planning process plays out here in the Bay Area, and <br />then Vivian Kahn from Dyett and Bhatia talked about sign code updates and sign <br />regulations. Dyett and Bhatia is the firm also helping us out with our Downtown Specific <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 33 of 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.