Laserfiche WebLink
reference that it was implemented in preparation for the Downtown Hospitality <br />Guidelines. Can you just expand on that? <br />Bonn: Sure, so previously the definition for restaurant versus bars included a 10:00 <br />p.m. cutoff for the sale of alcohol. So by definition of restaurant that sold alcohol past <br />10:00 p.m. was classified as a bar for purposes of the zoning code. That was modified <br />to 11:00 p.m. as part of the Downtown Hospitality Guidelines. One of the comments we <br />received for this update to the zoning code is that restaurants serving alcohol past <br />11:00 p.m. should not be classified as bars, and we're proposing not to address that at <br />this time given it was very recently addressed with the Hospitality Guidelines. <br />Commissioner Brown: Okay, all right <br />Commissioner Nagler: I think staff has done a terrific job in this process and they have <br />been remarkably diligent in reaching out to the community and reflecting their input and <br />that this is a terrific product and that the expertise of the Planning Commission has <br />helped, and that I think the product is very well supported. <br />Chair Ritter: Great. The best part about going last is that most things have been <br />discussed. My only question is on page 26, Table 18; parking lots. We just have one <br />under C -C as conditional. It sounds like they're excluding pay for parking facilities. I just <br />didn't know if that was an option or if that's something.... or are we good with that? <br />Beaudin: So what we're saying here is that paid parking lots are not permitted in most <br />of these zoning districts, and if you're going to do an off -site paid parking lot; if you're <br />just going to take a piece of property in a C -C zone, you have to come in and get a CUP <br />to operate that commercial business, which is essentially a parking structure or parking <br />lot that takes money for parking spaces. <br />Chair Ritter: So we're not excluding anything. <br />Beaudin: We're not excluding it in C -C. <br />Chair Ritter: Okay. <br />Commissioner Balch: I'll make a motion that we find that the proposed amendment to <br />the Municipal Code is exempt from CEQA and I move that we adopt a resolution <br />recommending approval of Case P16 -1418 with the following amendments which are: <br />For code section 18.124.200 which is the Minor CUP Element, we add Condition H <br />which says "A Minor PUD process and a Minor CUP process cannot run concurrently." <br />Staff could modify the language as they see fit; that we modify to say that Downtown <br />Retail C -C has a footnote added that says that 7,500 feet becomes between permitted <br />and now conditional; that we adjust the retail number for permitted versus condition <br />from 60,000 as it is written to 55,000 square feet; and that we modify Section 18.44.030 <br />which is related to the downtown language with the Downtown Revitalization to leave it <br />the way it is without the comments or redlines as proposed. So we're reverting to the <br />original text, and that was the Retail Downtown or the item Commissioner Allen brought <br />up; and, strongly recommends that a legend be added to the top of the Table listing the <br />zoning districts. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 32 of 49 <br />