PC 121416 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Brown: I suppose it could be minor but it's setting a precedent and you want to run it through as well. Beaudin: Correct, and frankly I would imagine some of these uses initially, and I think I've said this before to this group, the idea that we're going to get all this perfect the first time out is not there for me. I've seen it and lived it. We're going to make a lot of changes to the code and we're going to see some things that just don't work, and maybe we get our first couple of Minor CUP applications in one of these categories we've proposed and we just say it's not working and we say we'll be back to correct it with you. Commissioner Balch: So I just want to make sure.... Beaudin: Shweta is telling me that we have an internal policy, but I would want to modify it if it does come to the Planning Commission. We should say that it's 1,000 feet, and if that's the will of the Commission, I'd be supportive of that. It sounds like we're doing that but it's a policy decision and not in the code. I think it just makes sense for things like that to say it clearly. Commissioner Balch: I was going to ask but I didn't want to be so specific, because under our Minor PUD Mod, if it kicks up to Planning Commission, you re- notice and re- distribute the card for this meeting with 1,000 feet as I recall. Beaudin: What Shweta is saying is we've been doing that. It's the same thing with our 1,000 -foot notice. We did that by policy and not by law or by code. Commissioner Balch: Okay, so to make sure I understand —with a Minor CUP we do 300 feet. If it got kicked up because of difficulty or wanting to have it reviewed here, you would notice it for this meeting and increase the notice radius to 1,000 feet. Beaudin: Yes, and I would say that we'll make a change to the code so the language here says that clearly. Commissioner Nagler: It's different than what's here but it's a good idea. Beaudin: Yes. Commissioner Balch: And then my last question is more just a question on the uses in the Table on page 29. 1 just noticed that the places of assembly of 100 or fewer attendees at one time are this Minor CUP process. Can you give us your thoughts on what you're asking for here or what you're saying? I know where it's at. It's C -C and Office and Industrial and Park, right, so it's not necessarily that uncalled for per se. Bonn: The Community Facilities category is new. It's really a consolidation and includes places of worship, and so in evaluating what uses would be applicable to the Minor CUP process, one that frequently comes to the Planning Commission on the Consent Calendar are places of worship. 100 isn't a magic number but it seemed it could act as a reasonable threshold between what is a Minor CUP versus a CUP, that's essentially the gist of where that comes from. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 17 of 49