PC 121416 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Brown: So it's 1,000 feet of the PUD whereas the other one would be 300 feet around the proposed unit within the PUD. Is that correct? Bonn: There have been occasions where we do Minor PUD Modifications for a specific site and in that instance we've done a 1,000 -foot noticing radius around that particular property where that modifies only to that one particular site even though it's a PUD. Where it applies to the entire PUD we would do a 1,000 -foot radius around the PUD. Commissioner Brown: Right. I guess my point was if the site notification is 1,000 feet around the PUD, do you really need to go through a second cycle of noticing 300 feet around the target unit? So, again, I'm just reiterating what Greg's point is, but I think we should probably move on. Beaudin: I'm seeing a 4 -2 straw vote, so we'll move on. Commissioner Balch: My next question is in the staff report on page 9, and it is just more of a question for semantics. It talks about how the Zoning Administrator under the Minor CUP process can request studies to be performed so that they can have an informed decision in the Minor CUP process. It says here, "Request traffic, noise, and other technical studies." I just wanted to ask maybe how staff envisions this. At what point does it kick up to Planning Commission versus a staff level Minor CUP if we start to order all these reports? Beaudin: I think reports can just be confirmation in some instances. I think if something gets to be questionable or potentially controversial, I would imagine that would show up here at the Planning Commission and you would be making the decision on the Minor CUP. And that's how we handle things now when uses are under administrative review and we get information through the application process, make some decisions and decide to either elevate those things or make a final decision, and it's going to be subjective based on the application and context. Commissioner Balch: And I apologize because that's actually leading into my next comment or question which is, what would you do for a notice period or notice radius when it's coming here to make that decision, because 300 feet is not necessarily a standard for the Planning Commission, correct? Beaudin: It's a good question. It would still be the Planning Commission making a decision on a Minor CUP and the way we proposed it currently is still a 300 -foot radius. Commissioner O'Connor: I would have expected that if it was still a Minor CUP that the Zoning Administrator would make the decision, but if based on the information you have from these reports, if it was a little more challenging than that, it would be a regular CUP, right? Beaudin: It's a name only at that point. It would essentially still be a CUP that would run with the land and how we've defined it in the use table is how it would live through our process. We wouldn't adjust the use category it's in based on those details. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 16 of 49