PC 121416 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Balch: And that's where my argument is; that as the list grows —let's just say we have 10 uses that are following the Minor CUP process now, to get to 20, each time one gets added under this theory, if the applicant was trying to get that through a Minor PUD first, that just takes the breath, and it's 20 days —we're talking 20 days. And the second applicant has no breath. The same business park —the same PUD is already applied to the park as a whole, so the second and further applicants have no delay. I don't think it's that much of a hindrance on a business to wait 20 days when the use was never allowed under the PUD in the first place. If they want to accelerate it, in my opinion, they are welcome to come before this body and pay a little more to get here. But I think we talked about that being a three- to four -month process, so we still are shortening our window if I understand correctly. Beaudin: Relative to a CUP the Minor CUP is going to be a faster process. Processing Minor CUP and Minor PUD concurrently would be the fastest process, Minor CUP and Minor PUD non - concurrently and second fastest, and CUP would be slowest. Commissioner Balch: And my other point is that as things are added to the Minor CUP process through the standard zoning updates, this doesn't apply because it's only when the PUD had to be modified through a minor process because Minor PUDs don't come before the Planning Commission. Minor CUPS don't come to the Planning Commission. So my point is that while we're noticed through a process and that works, I haven't seen us ever contest one and I think part of our job is slight oversight and I just feel like we'd be giving up too much of it. Commissioner O'Connor: It makes a lot of sense when you talk about the example of Hacienda Business Park getting their first Minor PUD, but you've got to remember, almost everything we do is a PUD. So almost any change outside of the business park and every PUD change that needs a Minor CUP change are going to have to go through a two -step process. There's very few —it's not going to be where we're going to have multiples coming through the Hacienda Business Park, so you can only have a stall on one for the business park. It's like every other project is its own. Commissioner Balch: Not necessarily because if we do a Minor PUD for example to add a use and the use is straight up, it's going to go in as permitted. This doesn't apply. This is only if the use goes in as a slightly more than permitted and slightly less than conditional. It only has two choices right now. When you modify your PUD you can only go in as conditional or as permitted. If they go in as conditional, there's a three -month wait under the current system. All I'm saying is that if they choose this middle ground where it needed to be a little bit more than permitted and a little bit less than conditional, that would mean .... you know what I'm saying; that's where I'm at on that one. Chair Ritter: Do we need to get a resolution on that point before we move on? Beaudin: A straw vote would be great just so we can keep a tally as we go. Chair Ritter: Can you please summarize what Commissioner Balch said. Beaudin: I believe what Commissioner Balch is looking for is non - concurrent processing of Minor PUD Modifications and Minor CUPs when they're being added to PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 13 of 49