My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 102616
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 102616
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:55:41 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:48:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/26/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Beaudin: It's not. They're doing an update to Plan Bay Area. We've been <br />corresponding with them for several months now. We've put letters in from staff <br />questioning methodologies and some of the assumptions they've been using and on <br />November 15th we'll have a letter from the Mayor that does the same on behalf of the <br />City of Pleasanton for the City Council's consideration. We're following it closely, and <br />we're not in agreement. We haven't gotten a lot of responsiveness from our partners at <br />ABAG and MTC at this point in time so it will be discussed. It will be on the City Council <br />agenda in some form on November 15tH <br />Commissioner Allen: Thank you, and just one follow -up question, if in fact these are the <br />numbers over time, I'm assuming this would be fed into our RHNA numbers in some <br />way or how is it related? <br />Beaudin: So Plan Bay Area is a regional planning program. ABAG is a regional <br />planning effort, but ABAG and our RHNA numbers translate into the City's need to <br />rezone for a certain number and type of units so the Plan Bay Area projections are a <br />30 year planning effort and RHNA is an 8 year planning cycle where we actually look at <br />ways to make sure the City can accommodate the numbers. They're not directly related <br />but they do inform one another. <br />Commissioner Allen: Thank you. <br />Chair Ritter: Okay, great, any other matters? All right. <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW /ACTION /INFORMATION <br />a. Reports from Meetings Attended (e.g., Committee, Task Force, etc.) <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />b. Future Planning Calendar <br />Adam Weinstein informed the Commission that Vesting Tentative Map Tract 8352, GHC <br />Lund Ranch, LLC will be on the November 9, 2016 agenda and the Valley Trails <br />residential project and Zoning Code Update will be on the December 14, 2016 agenda. <br />Chair Ritter: Okay, the zoning code update — you're doing outreach right now? <br />Weinstein: Yes, we've received some really great feedback from the Economic Vitality <br />Committee and individuals in the community; the PDA, Chamber of Commerce, and we <br />want to hold one more meeting to circle back to those folks just to let them know how <br />we incorporated their edits before bringing the proposed code update to the Planning <br />Commission. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So the two items you said are on the December calendar will <br />be Valley Trails and...? <br />Weinstein: Yes, the Valley Trails residential project and the zoning code update. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 26, 2016 Page 6 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.