My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 102616
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 102616
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:55:41 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:48:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/26/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Balch: I would just comment that I don't agree with using a mobile citizen <br />app to report to the city that a private property owner has made a mistake on their <br />private property with where they put an EV charging station. Would you like the city to <br />come out and tell them? <br />Chair Ritter: Is this a private property? <br />Commissioner O'Connor: We would have approved this <br />Commissioner Brown: We would have approved the plans. <br />Noted Present: Commissioner Nagler was noted present at 7:12 p.m. <br />Commissioner Nagler: When we're looking at plans like at Lund Ranch, are we looking <br />at where they're going to put a public charging station? <br />Commissioner O'Connor: We don't, but whoever looks at the... <br />Commissioner Brown: I don't know if staff wanted to comment. <br />Beaudin: So it's not an agendized item so I'm not going to go very far here at all tonight. <br />I will say I'm happy to talk with any of you at any given time about EV charging stations. <br />We do look at these when we approve projects. In this particular instance, I was able to <br />talk with the person who was the Community Development Director at the time and this <br />was early in the EV charging game for the City of Pleasanton in general. There just <br />weren't that many cars when we were approving this project and not as many as now <br />and so what ended up happening here is we didn't want to forego the regular vehicle <br />parking at that point in time as part of the approval process. It was put there. It was <br />part of the applicant's program. It wasn't required by the City and the expectation was <br />that this would be a station used for staff and not necessarily for the general public. <br />Obviously, it's there and people will want to use it and it could be designed better and <br />we would do it differently if we were looking at it today. So we do look at this. We are <br />also doing a zoning code update and so when we're looking at our parking standards <br />and requirements, we'll get into EV charging in more detail just like we'll get into bicycle <br />parking requirements in more detail. That's probably as far as I'll go here tonight, but <br />that's kind of a project specific and maybe higher level look at EV charging. <br />Chair Ritter: Thank you. Any other matters? <br />Commissioner Allen: For staff, I was just reading the latest Independent which had an <br />article about ABAG housing projections for Tri- Valley cities that said that through 2040 <br />Pleasanton would add 9,900 units and it had numbers for Dublin, Livermore, and I <br />guess the other cities are having their forecasts verified and then it goes to their City <br />Council for ratification. What I'm wondering, one, is the number right, and number two <br />is what is our process if any for validating or taking this number further? <br />Commissioner O'Connor: Isn't this early for ABAG? <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 26, 2016 Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.