PC 102616 - Laserfiche WebLink

c. Actions of the City Council Commissioner Nagler: May I go back and ask a question on the Council item? I'm sorry. Is Irby Ranch coming up to the Council this calendar year? Weinstein: It's not going to happen this year. As you all know, Sunflower Hill dropped out of the agreement with the developer so right now the developer is trying to find a new partner that would allow them to proceed with the Irby Ranch project and it's likely that that process is going to take a bit of time and it's possible that could trigger modifications to the design that you saw already. So we really don't expect that to come back this year. Beaudin: Can I maybe add to that just a little bit? Do you have more? Commissioner Nagler: I have questions about that, but go ahead. Beaudin: So Adam characterized it as Sunflower Hill dropping out and I just want to make sure it's clarified for the record. It's true but it's a little more complicated. Obviously, when they were here we started talking about considering additional property. I don't want to talk too much about it because I actually do think it's something that could potentially come back. I don't know if it will be with Sunflower Hill or with someone else, but I think there is an interest in keeping that project alive on the part of the developer and ultimately Sunflower Hill did come down with a 2 acre request and that was just too much for the developer to be able to accommodate. So that's the situation we're in right now. The developer has asked us to pause the application and we'll do that for a reasonable amount of time then they're going to have to decide if they're going to go forward or withdraw their application. Commissioner Nagler: So if I could just ask a quick follow -up? I believe this would be so, but let me just confirm. If the application changes in any substantive way; substantive being defined by a new partner, a change in configuration in the plan of any meaningful sort, that would come back to the Commission, right? Beaudin: Yes, you all would see it again and really, you know, unless they were able to come back with the program that the Planning Commission already recommended to the City Council; if there was an agreement on an amount of land and they were able to meet the other criteria, I think that would be the only way that you wouldn't see it again. If it's a different partner, a different configuration, or the project differs even moderately, we'll bring it back through this process. Commissioner Nagler: Thank you. Commissioner Balch: And to that end, does the process include the workshop again and the full process? Beaudin: It really depends on the scale of changes that are being discussed. Commissioner Balch: Fair enough. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 26, 2016 Page 7 of 8