Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Brown: I'm just going to reiterate my earlier comment. The Johnson <br />Drive spillback worries me as it relates to the other two drive - thru's and going back to <br />the prior point, I think Greg described it well in terms of expressing the additional <br />concerns on the uses because they said they didn't need to be that restrictive and they'll <br />revisit that. <br />Commissioner Nagler: I don't really have any additional comments other than to say <br />this project obviously requires more conversation. The general use of the site I think is a <br />good concept towards a higher purpose, but that we obviously need to see a lot more. <br />As far as the Commission, it might be helpful if we saw more computer renderings. <br />Commissioner Allen: So I think we're all concerned with the queueing and we've had a <br />discussion about whether 12 or 13 might work. I guess where I come out is, let's <br />pretend they're able to come up with a design that meets 12 or 13. I'm still not sure <br />that's adequate. So therefore the additional information if we went down that route that I <br />would request is what we discussed earlier— getting some better benchmark data about <br />comparable.... fast -food, Starbucks...I mean, we could have something beyond <br />Starbucks because we've got a risk there that somebody else could take us over so I <br />think we need to look at freeway kind of projects that are Starbucks and others and <br />understand what the queue is. Plus, understand what the queue is of In -N -Out Burger, <br />just the nearby ones; In -N -Out Burger plus the Starbucks. But anyway, understand all of <br />those because it could be that 12 to 13 is still a risk because again we have no backup <br />if there's any kind of spillover. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: Well, I would like to see additional photo simulations once we <br />get closer to a final, or an improved design. Like Justin, I'm not supporting the drive - <br />thru because I think we have too many in the area. Even if we can make the queue <br />work, I think we're going to create a traffic nightmare in this area. It's already bad there <br />and Denny's isn't even open right now. So, my concern is having three drive -thru <br />operations is such a small area. <br />Commissioner Balch: So as I mentioned, I've seen Galen's work in the past. I think this <br />is top notch on the architectural but I do have major concerns about the lot, the design <br />and the circulation. What I want to point out to staff and everyone is that these are <br />9 -foot by 19 -foot parking spots. They are called universal in my world. I don't know if <br />that's what they call them in retail. Universal spot means you are very compacted on <br />your neighboring car because it's not a 10 -foot wide, it's a 9 -foot wide and it's what <br />people do to get the parking coverage. It's just very popular. But, if you're trying to park <br />in front of Building B in those five compact spots, just getting through the lot and <br />circulation just to get into that spot is difficult with this site layout. You're going to have <br />to get through, people trying to turn into the queue, you've got to get past the entire <br />linear length of A just to make it down to B. So that's one illustration of the difficulty that <br />this layout presents. <br />I'm really worried about the blocking or the queueing on Johnson Court and basically <br />blocking any thru traffic up further because there's two driveways in the current Denny's <br />configuration as I recall. There's one kind of approximately where this one's at but <br />there's also one more northerly that is being filled in so that people can't go to the <br />northern one to get into the lot. The uses of the C -F like I mentioned a little bit; the <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 28, 2016 Page 30 of 32 <br />