Laserfiche WebLink
fact, it's a little hard because the C -F zoning is for like a boat lot and you know, a large <br />retail camping store and all the things that draw people off of the freeway and into their <br />lot which this particular lot will not have an auto dealership type of thing that will draw <br />people off of the freeway. But, when I looked at the permitted uses circled and the uses <br />not circled, I think they have some work to do to determine exactly what they're going to <br />allow on the lot. You know, it is a lot of restaurant and retail. The retail is like nails, hair, <br />things like that circled, and you kind of get the idea that bars are out and things like that. <br />But, generally my comment is that you're a C -F straight up zoning, you're circled or <br />permitted items requested on your PUD there's not one from the C -F that comes over. <br />So it's truly a new zoning with a PUD element and I question that and question how far <br />that is, but I'd give you the benefit that they're working through kind of what it is. That <br />being said, the C -F district straight up doesn't apply either as I said with the boat zoning <br />or boat lot type of thing. That's the only one I can remember as I'm on the spot. <br />Commissioner Nagler: I don't have any further comments. <br />Commissioner Balch: I'm going to add which is my other, which is, they designed for a <br />drive -thru so at least that one cannot be conditional, right? If you have a drive -thru <br />you've got to figure out if it's conditional or permitted at the start right? So my one <br />comment is the one mentioned earlier but you clarified it. <br />Commissioner Allen: So I'm okay with the uses. I think it makes sense to look to see if <br />there's some additional ones that are C -F and I think if there is a drive -thru it needs to <br />be conditional, and I say that because Gerry and Julie you mentioned that the <br />Starbucks ... that something else could go into Starbucks that may have a different <br />demand and we need to also have conditions that protect us against that. <br />Commissioner Nagler: I agree with that <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So initially before it was circled they didn't have a drive -thru <br />so I was okay. I thought that they restricted themselves somewhat with the big circle, <br />but I did hear them say earlier that they didn't mean to be as restrictive so we'd have to <br />see what the new list is proposed. At this point, I'm not supportive of the drive -thru. <br />Commissioner Balch: The difficulty is that we just had an informational staff presentation <br />about redoing the zoning or the readability of the zoning code so when I read this again <br />I thought, oh, now I remember why exactly we went back to doing that plan. <br />Chair Ritter: So my thinking is the types of businesses that we want to get in there <br />demand parking for customers that will be within an hour or an hour and one -half, so as <br />long as the zoning is appropriate to those needs I think that would keep the turning of <br />the business working for that location. So C -F, C -S, whatever one of those keeps that <br />kind of business should go in. <br />E. What other information would assist the Planning Commission in its decision on <br />the proposal (e.g., additional photo simulations). Do you have any other <br />comments on the project? <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 28, 2016 Page 29 of 32 <br />