PC 092816 - Laserfiche WebLink

because I'm sure after 20 iterations pretty much every combination has being considered. So, that's my overriding concern. I don't know how your proposed tenant would react, but you might want to consider not doing the drive -thru and having a better project as a result. I do agree with staff in that I do tend to prefer a building closer to the street, but like David, I'm not hard and fast on that if it's an appropriate use. Commissioner Balch: I want to pick up on that because in terms of the site layout, you know, if I could comment, I would actually be supportive of that idea with the building, and I'm sure staff could advocate against me right now, but I'd be generally supportive of the idea of not having a building on the street at this location if it made the building and entire site layout work a little bit better. And, I don't know if an L where you can drive in front along the parallel to Owens is the answer. I'm not trying to design from the dais, but the concept of building on the street and how that would work, I'd be open to that idea. Commissioner Brown: One comment is three drive - thru's in very popular businesses; In- N -Out, Chick -Fil -A and I don't want to presuppose what this one is although I can guess, in such close proximity competing with each other is fraught with problems, so given that the other two are approved and we can't change that, but approving a third in this small proximity is going to be pretty trafficked complex. Chair Ritter: I concur with pretty much everybody here. I think taking, as Commissioner O'Connor said, a two -lane queue and making A -2 smaller —I still think that could be an option. I know Starbucks has done that. Also moving A -1 and A -2 and B all along the Owens Drive side and making the parking behind it so that the drive -thru could be going along Owens Drive may be an option but I'm not going to design from up here but I'd say you've got to at least have 12 or 13 spots in there just because all of the traffic from the current drive - thru's in that area. B. Does the Planning Commission support the proposed building architecture, exterior finishes, and color palette including staffs recommendation on the north elevation on Building A? Commissioner Brown: Yes. Commissioner Balch: Yes, except for the name "Owens Court." And if it is that, it won't get my vote. I'll just say it straight —I don't want it called Owens Court. The court is misleading as to the location on the street. Commissioner Nagler: Yes. Commissioner Allen: Yes with two additional minor changes. One is on Building B. I don't know if there's a photo we can put up of Building B but there was a large, dark wall in the middle of Building B that looked a little bit wide in my opinion. Others can vet on that. Yes. Commissioner O'Connor: Oh the west elevation. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 28, 2016 Page 26 of 32