My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092816
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 092816
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:55:30 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:47:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/28/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Allen: So that just felt pretty blocky and I would make the same request <br />of softening that up. And the second is color of the parapet. I think we'll want to be very <br />careful about the color. Some of the visuals mostly in the staff report show the lighter <br />more yellow color. In contrast, this diagram showed more of a grey and darker color. I <br />think the lighter yellow color makes me think of Jack in the Box and a service station so <br />I mean, I think we need to be very thoughtful about a darker color and I maybe one that <br />might complement the hotel behind it because they have a lot of nice earth tones and <br />you don't want it competing with that because this is lower and you're looking at the <br />hotel often times. These diagrams show a darker color but it was more the staff report <br />had more of a yellow so let's be careful of the tone. <br />Commissioner Nagler: There's definitely sophistication to this color palette that we like. <br />Commissioner Allen: Yes, I think this architecture is really, really nice and colorful. <br />Chair Ritter: And I concur with the comments regarding the color palette and exterior <br />finishes. <br />C. Is the tree removal /replacement plan adequate and should the applicant <br />contribute to the Urban Forestry Fund? <br />Commissioner Balch: There's a picture in the staff report of the site layout and plans. <br />Where is this heritage tree? I'm looking at A -7 in the plans. It's this little script next to <br />the... like the pole. <br />Weinstein: If you go to your tree report. I forget the number exhibit, but it's Tree No. 110 <br />so I think it's Exhibit B. The very end of the exhibit is the tree assessment plan map and <br />if you look at the very eastern side of the site, Tree 110 is the heritage tree. It's a pear <br />tree and it's probably right in the middle of the drive aisle as currently proposed. <br />Commissioner Balch: I'm okay with its removal and I'm okay with no contributions to the <br />tree fund or whatever. I'm okay with that out. <br />Commissioner Nagler: As long as the number of trees planted are at least the number <br />that are currently in the plan, I'm fine with it and not needing a contribution. <br />Commissioner Brown: Yes, I mean given it's placement I'm okay with the removal. I'm <br />willing to go with the majority on not enforcing. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So I'll just step back and say I think if we move the buildings <br />forward we can save the tree, but whether we save the tree or not, I don't have a <br />problem with foregoing the fee. But since we're taking all of the trees out and starting <br />over, I would like to see larger trees put in; a minimum 24 -inch box so it doesn't just look <br />like sticks when you start. <br />All Commissioners: That's a great comment. <br />Chair Ritter: I'll agree. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 28, 2016 Page 27 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.