Laserfiche WebLink
Beaudin: We'd have to agendize something like that, and I think it would almost be a <br />personal interest. I appreciate the fact that the City has done it in the past, and so we <br />can agendize something like that if that's a discussion you want to have and we'll flesh it <br />out a little bit more. <br />Chair Ritter: I just like having this at meetings because it gets us on all different parts of <br />the City so it kind of keeps us communicate with others. Okay, any reports like that? <br />Commissioner Allen: Nope. <br />Commissioner Nagler: The Heritage Tree Appeals Board met this evening and had two <br />matters before it which we resolved. And, speaking of being on the committee, there <br />need not be any immediate action but I'm finding that I'm not fulfilling my duties on the <br />Appeals Board due to tardiness and it's unfair to the workings of the Appeals Board. So <br />at the opportune time, I would ask that someone else consider serving on the Board. <br />Beaudin: We'll agendize this entire section of the agenda. <br />c. Future Planning Calendar <br />Commissioner Balch: Can I just ask about this? I noticed that our Chabad has dropped <br />off. <br />Beaudin: They're in escrow. As soon as we have an application, we'll be ready to go <br />Commissioner Allen: Do we know when the Irby project is going to Council? <br />Beaudin: We've had them tentatively scheduled for October 4th, but we actually are re- <br />evaluating that now. There are some issues with some of the details that the Planning <br />Commission had asked to be refined. We're not sure that we're as far along as we need <br />to be to get to the October 4th meeting. So we're still working hard on that. It's still a <br />possibility for the 4`h, but it's less likely after some meetings today. <br />Commissioner Allen: Okay, thank you. And out of curiosity - -I think I know the answer to <br />this, but on the conditions we asked for, will there be any interim report to us on how <br />that's coming along or discussions with us? Or, do you just create your plan and bring it <br />directly to City Council and we won't know what it is until we see the same staff report. <br />Beaudin: The plan is to get the revisions into good shape. I'm happy to talk with the <br />Commission. I wouldn't want to do that in a public hearing format because I've received <br />the direction from you and I'm working through that. The next procedural step is the City <br />Council. I'm happy to talk with you about the progress we're making and the areas we're <br />still kind of digging around a little bit. So, just let me know. <br />Commissioner Allen: Great, thank you <br />Chair Ritter: Can you get back to that? The role of us after it passes through the <br />Planning Commission with a vote —what should we do or not do as it moves onto City <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 14, 2016 Page 13 of 22 <br />