My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 083116
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 083116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:53:24 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:42:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/31/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Flagpoles look a lot better than the fake trees, and things are going to get better, so I <br />encourage you to do that and I would encourage you to find some appropriate districts <br />for conference centers and event centers. There's going to be more of those. And I'll <br />close with one final prediction. 1- 580/1 -680 is going to change the face of this city more <br />in the next 20 years than it has in the last 50 years. That's my prediction. Thank you <br />very much for your time. <br />Commissioner Nagler: May I ask a question of him? Mr. Hirst? <br />Hirst: You can call me Brad. I'm still for 3 -story parking in the civic center. <br />Commissioner Nagler: I know. We fought that battle. We did well on that one, thank you <br />very much. So on your table or comments of the table, are there any particular ones <br />here that rise to a higher level of importance for you that you want to highlight? <br />Hirst: I'd like to defer answering that question at the moment. I'm sure if I sat down and <br />gave it some thought I'd come up with some. In fairness to staff, they just got those the <br />day before yesterday or maybe yesterday and I don't know if they can even read my <br />handwriting which is a challenge, but I'd be happy to answer that question if I could.... <br />Commissioner Nagler: ... Okay, an invitation to answer the question. Prioritize. Okay, <br />thank you. <br />Hirst: Thank you very much. <br />Chair Ritter: All right, we'll close the public hearing and bring it back <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Chair Ritter: Okay, let's go through the questions. Number 1 <br />Does the Planning Commission find the proposed land use categories <br />acceptable? <br />Weinstein. So just for clarification, we're talking about primarily the really broad <br />categories that we used to organize the uses in the table. Under the existing code we <br />had these long laundry list of uses, so what we're doing is consolidating them into these <br />broader categories like office, business service, industrial, retail, instead of listing out <br />every single type of retail use... candy shop, clothing shop, etc. <br />Chair Ritter: So I guess instead of asking that - -Which ones do we not....? <br />Commissioner Balch: Are these on pages 12 and 13? Are these the ones we're talking <br />about specifically? And just as a general comment on the table, I'm just horrible at <br />remembering all of the definitions of the IP and I think you guys should rotate that <br />90 degrees and write them out frankly at the top of your table, like `Commercial V <br />because a user.... <br />Commissioner Brown: You read my mind. It's one of my points too <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 41 of 58 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.