PC 083116 - Laserfiche WebLink

Brad Hirst: Thanks for taking so much time going through the line by line. Let me say first of all that this is a huge, huge step forward. The staff is dealing with the same zoning code that I dealt with in 1969. Things change. Gerry probably has a better handle on the importance of the zoning code than anybody that's been in City planning since 1969 that I know of, so he is in my opinion really guiding you in the right direction. And the right direction is to simplify and save time. It's going to save the staff time which in turn directly affects the City budget which is kind of important. It's going to save you time. It's going to save property owners time and very importantly, it's going to save business owners time who want to get in. So saving time is hugely important. With that, there are a few other things I would like to say. Just for historical information, the 1,000 foot notification came about because the City used to follow the state statutory requirement of 300 feet and then around 1970 people obviously were never notified. They get 25 different cards but they never got a notice, so the City Council at that time said okay, we'll go 500 feet. Well, the same people still weren't getting notified so they went to 1,000 feet. So that's really how it happened was because people said they never got notified. So that's just for historical information. One thing I would like to mention that Commissioner Brown brought up about the time. The two categories of people that are not being considered in those comments are the property owners and the businesses that want to locate. It may not seem like much time to somebody at the City if they have to wait 60 -90 days to find out whether or not a business can locate, but if you own a vacant property on Quarry Lane or you're a machine shop trying to lease that property on Quarry Lane and you have to wait 45 days, that makes a big difference. A classic example in Pleasanton is the Kolln Hardware Building. It came within less than three hours of being foreclosed on by a bank because they didn't have a tenant. Fortunately, Community Bank stepped up, made them the loan and time went on and they could sign the loan with the bank. And speaking of banks, I would like to just mention to you that when you see a lot of banks in town, do you know what that means? There's a lot of money. There's a lot of money. I was in downtown Lodi one time and I couldn't figure out how many banks there were. I did a little community research and I found out why there were so many banks in downtown Lodi. There was a lot of money there. Okay, having said all of that, I'm not taking up all of my 5 minutes which I appreciate. I would like to, and I think that all of you probably have gotten the email that I sent in and just to paraphrase a couple of things, I would like to encourage you not to delete the LI professional district. Maybe you could do some consolidating into IP, but the reason —I think there are a couple of LI districts now; one on Sonoma Drive and one on Old Santa Rita Road. I think those are both LI .... well, Santa Rita might be IG, but IP is an industrial park. When you're dealing in LI, you're usually dealing with one or two parcels of property and it frankly is kind of ludicrous to do a landscape plan with botanical names for a machine shop and that's what's been happening. So anything you could do to speed up the process would be good, and I would encourage you to make cell sites permitted uses in all of the commercial and office districts. Julie Harryman did a cell site ordinance and brought us into compliance with federal law and I can assure you that there's going to be a lot more cell sites in the coming years. We're just scratching the surface. Data transfer is the elephant in the room. There's going to be more and more of it. There's going to be more and more cell sites that are going to be camouflaged. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 40 of 58