PC 083116 - Laserfiche WebLink

included in the definition that is ultimately adopted for a minor CUP but which in fact is that two percent of the applications which ought to maybe have a public hearing. Beaudin: Can I just say from a procedural perspective, anything that comes in as a minor CUP can always... you know, if it starts to generate a lot of neighborhood interest, if it starts to generate a lot of concern even at the staff level, it will be pushed to the Planning Commission and it will be still called a minor CUP but it will be reviewed here and ultimately everything is appealable as well. So if we make a decision that's questioned by anyone, they come forward with the appeal and it comes to the Planning Commission as well, so there is a check in the process both on the front end and on the back end. Chair Ritter: I can think of two tennis courts Weinstein: And from the Planning Commission, all I'm saying is either the Planning Commission or the City Council could pull items as well that would be listed on our report that would be published and included in your packet as well. Commissioner Brown: Would they still be charged the $750 versus the $3,000 in that instance? Beaudin: The lower fee, whatever it is set at, would apply Commissioner Balch: And the other element to that is obviously if it gets pulled up you have to re- notice if you're not 1,000 feet. Beaudin: We would. We would do that for a hearing. Commissioner Balch: Okay. To Commissioner Nagler's comment, when I read this I kept thinking Zoning Administrator type actions and so what does this do that that's not providing you that this whole new group is here? Beaudin: Yes, it's the cost and the amount of time that goes into it. Commissioner Balch: Just because it meets the criteria of a conditional use, right? Beaudin: Right, and so the amount of staff review and the amount of lead time we need with the application is much less and the cost is significantly less. This would be reflected in the Master Fee Schedule knowing that the zoning ordinance update was coming, and so we pegged it at $750 versus $3,000 for the CUP. So it's an easier hurdle for someone who's trying to establish a business that we've seen established a number of times in the community and then the timeframe is on the order of months and not weeks in terms of time savings just because of the hearing process and the amount of staff work that goes into a standard use permit. Bonn: Maybe the other point too is that this is a new process and you know, I'd be the first to admit there's probably going to be some uses that should be included that aren't and maybe vice versa, so at some point it's going to take some self - evaluation on staff's part to say, is this really achieving what we want it to or you know, is it really doing what PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 33 of 58