PC 083116 - Laserfiche WebLink

CUPs to 300 feet for this minor CUP. But if you have comments on whether that should be expanded or detracted, we're happy to hear them. Chair Ritter: Questions? Commissioner Balch: So I guess the question is, right, given the current approval levels you have in the City, what are your radius levels now. You have 1,000 feet I know and we've heard that we don't want to reduce it to the statutory 500 feet required because it's basically a City process or a procedure forever that that is the radius we notice, right? Beaudin: So I'm not going to be able to answer your question directly. The statutory requirement is 300 feet and so we here in Pleasanton have decided to notice 1,000 feet for CUPs. I don't know the answer on if we're doing 500 feet or 1,000 feet on Zoning Administrator level approvals right now. Kendall may know because she does all of the noticing for us. Do you know what the radius for the legal notice is? Kendall Rose: If it goes to any type of hearing including Zoning Administrator, Staff Review Board, Planning Commission, or City Council, we notice a 1,000 -foot radius. If it's an administrative level project, such as an ADR, we only notice the adjacent properties. Then we have 100, 300, and 600 -foot radius projects such as outdoor dining, Christmas tree lots, large family daycares, and new wireless sites. Commissioner Balch: There comes my adjourned challenge to which is, what is your radius of notice even in the new process in light of your current processes for staff and zoning administrator process or others, right, I would advise given the 1,000 feet has been told to me for a while that we need a consistent.... and it doesn't need to be a consistent 1,000 feet but it's something that you're able to defend as your process. Commissioner Nagler: Can I ask a question? Can you give us an example of .... you point out that what you're really trying to cover are those items that currently come to the Planning Commission which are typically on Consent. Can you just give us an example of an item if you have one that came to the Planning Commission that was not on Consent but you would include in this definition of a Minor Conditional Use Permit? Do you know what I'm asking? Weinstein: So we're in the process of going back now and reviewing all of our CUPs that have gone to the Planning Commission over the last several years. We've only gone back a couple of years at this point so I don't think we have a great list of the breakdown for different CUPs. But what we're talking about here are uses like arts and crafts studios with more than 20 students on site at any given time. These are often uses that are looking to locate in retail centers but there's already lots of activity. Generally speaking, the times people are coming to these sorts of uses are metered, right? There's not a huge outpouring of people at 5:00 p.m. or in pouring at 8:00 a.m. so again, they're routine uses that generally don't have a lot of spillover impacts. Commissioner Nagler: No, that's fine. Here's why I'm asking the question and to be thought about, is what you are proposing are minor things just like you suggested, but the issue is really what might be outliers. What might be those things which would be PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 32 of 58 L