Laserfiche WebLink
we intended to. So there's probably going to be a check at some point to see if it's <br />actually accomplishing the goal. <br />Commissioner Balch: So on that note, if you find that it's catching too many or not <br />catching enough, how do you amend this given you're asking for a zoning amendment, <br />right? Is there flexibility in how you've written it that you can exclude more? <br />Beaudin: We'll come back. It'll be a public hearing process and we'll probably call it <br />"Zoning Ordinance Cleanup Number 1" and that's just what happens when you take <br />something 30+ years old that really hasn't been comprehensively looked at in a period <br />of time. I was telling staff that when I've done this in other communities that that is the <br />process, and you probably pick a date frankly as staff from the day it's adopted and you <br />say six months from now we're going to evaluate what we've seen so far and then you'll <br />do it again in six months and probably again in another six months. And we may be <br />back with you in six months or 12, but I can guarantee you that within the first year we'll <br />be back with a list of things we need to make further adjustments to. <br />Commissioner Brown: What was the justification for the 10 days for minors given that it <br />sounds like you're shortening something that could say take a month or two months? <br />You've shortened it down to 10 days, is that enough? My concern is people go away for <br />a week and it takes three days to get the mail, etc., etc. So 10 days to me is a little <br />short. I mean you're drastically improving it for people. You lower the cost of the fee <br />which is great and you're going from months down to 10 days which seems a little short. <br />Was there a justification for the 10 days or is that up for discussion? <br />Bonn: It's certainly up for discussion. The thought process there is that it's sort of a <br />middle point. So we have some administrative processes that require a seven day <br />noticing period so it's even shorter than the 10 -day, and the other factor is the appeal <br />period on the tail end and on the front end, the time it takes for staff to be able to send <br />out the notices. We typically have to work with applicants a little bit before we're <br />prepared to send out the notice to surrounding neighbors so it's not necessarily day <br />one. I mean, if it's a great, clean, perfect application and it has everything we need then <br />we can send the notices out on day one, but what happens more often than not is that <br />there's something that needs to get clarified or we have to work through some topics of <br />discussion and it's a little bit of time before that notice can go out. So like I said, it's <br />certainly up for discussion. It was sort of maybe the middle ground. The minor <br />modification process that we have now is a 10 day noticing process. <br />Commissioner Brown: Okay. <br />Commissioner Balch: Could you repeat that? The zoning administrator actions are a <br />10 day process right now, right? The intended notice period? <br />Bonn: So for a PUD where's somebody is proposing to modify the PUD, we call it a <br />PUD Minor Modification. The notification for that is a 10 day noticing. <br />Commissioner Balch: Sorry. I misheard, but thank you <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 34 of 58 <br />