Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Balch: Can I ask a clarification on that? Was that only for the area <br />between the clubhouse and the existing sidewalk or was that the entire sidewalk <br />throughout the linear park? <br />Lee: It was just for the pathways because the existing sidewalk is already 7 -8 feet and I <br />think it gets a little wider at other points. <br />Commissioner Balch: So is that from the clubhouse to the existing sidewalk or is that <br />the sidewalk that meanders the entire linear lane for the park? <br />Lee: Just from the clubhouse to the trail. <br />Commissioner Balch: To the sidewalk. <br />Lee: Yes. <br />Commissioner Balch: So if I may, 2C, I did want to mention that I was supporting the <br />bathrooms pointing outwards so they were public and not having to go through that <br />clubhouse area. I thought that was a natural course. Okay, so a couple of things in <br />terms of the layout, I think the layout's really good. One of the comments that we have <br />received, I think it was supplemental to the Commission package, was someone asking <br />about the heights and the layouts and basically a lot of the units —I think 15 or so —and <br />the fact that in their opinion that the majority are two -story. But, when I looked at the <br />plan and then with the applicant's comments, while I can't foresee a lot of problems with <br />it, you know, I think this is a fairly good up /down changing. I did want to mention or kind <br />of bring up and maybe for discussion is, do we think the intersection onto Valley Trails <br />Drive; the single intersection —do we think that is properly going to be handled in light of <br />the comments we received tonight? <br />Beaudin: Yes, so I'm going to jokingly say I'm going to channel Mike Tassano. We had <br />a conversation about the Lassen and B Street intersection with Valley Trails earlier <br />today and about three weeks ago. The point has been raised. There are a couple of <br />different perspectives. It's a new development and having a controlled intersection 4- <br />way stop seems like a natural fit in today's society. A lot of the intersections around <br />Valley Trails loop do not have any stop signs. And so the City Traffic Engineer <br />continues to evaluate this intersection. The applicant has shown a 4 -way stop. We think <br />that a 2 -way stop on the minor streets and not on Valley Trails can work just fine if we <br />need stop signs at all. So I would say tonight I'll conservatively say we're talking about a <br />2 -way stop for this intersection but more likely we're talking about an uncontrolled <br />intersection much like the rest of Valley Trails and when we look at the number of <br />vehicle trips coming out of Lassen right now, the threshold for stop signs is 100 peak <br />hour trips and if you add all of the vehicle trips up in the two neighborhoods and you <br />make some assumptions about when people leave their house which Mike does on a <br />regular basis, it falls under that threshold. Valley Trails itself would have to have <br />upwards of 300 vehicle trips so that is also not happening. There are kind of two ways <br />for people to get out of this neighborhood. So we're somewhere in the middle right now I <br />would say with a two -way stop being a maximum level of control and it's possible we'll <br />have no traffic control at this intersection. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 26 of 58 <br />