My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052516
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 052516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:43:02 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:31:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/25/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
market demands for small offices because obviously you're not going to put a high rise <br />office building on the civic center site so you're, by definition, talking about insurance <br />offices, accountant and lawyer offices and things like that and there isn't demand in the <br />community for that kind of use of that property. I'm not saying that should dictate clearly <br />our conversation tonight, but it's another data point about a piece of property directly <br />across the street. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: Sure, as we keep talking about vitality downtown, office <br />doesn't usually generate the vitality you're talking about in a downtown location. <br />Commissioner Allen: If I could just follow -up with that, so if it's not office then what are <br />the choices — retail, mixed use or residential? <br />Commissioner Nagler: Retail, mixed use, residential, potentially a small movie theater, <br />restaurants, entertainment. <br />Commissioner Allen: So we don't know. I mean if it's retail then do we want to turn <br />property across the street which is office into residential or is it better to consider it for <br />retail? I mean, we don't know which way it's going to go. <br />Commissioner Nagler: No, we don't have any idea. <br />Commissioner Allen: Do you know in terms of where it's going? <br />Commissioner Balch: We'll keep it to this item. <br />Chair Ritter: Okay, so let's hear from the applicant. We have Mike Carey and after that <br />we have a speaker card from Tim Ward. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Mike Carey – Applicant: Tim is the architect so he can kind of jump in with me. Thanks <br />everybody. Staff has been awesome to work with. Tim designed the Starbuck's <br />downtown so we're really excited to work with him because he has some great ideas <br />and concepts on mixed use and he's done a lot of projects in Lafayette and kind of all of <br />the surrounding towns. <br />We're super excited from where we started and how we evolved. We started with Gerry <br />and we started out with live /work on site. We brought in three live /work units and I <br />believe two or three houses? <br />Tim Ward: Two. <br />Carey: The live /work was a great idea but we kind of explored and we talked to Gerry <br />and we figured they'd probably move into the units and never work there. We were <br />ahead of ourselves and we are not quite Berkeley and all that, but we started with that a <br />little bit. And then we started changing the plans. Tim came up with studios on top which <br />I thought was a great idea because everybody's looking to downsize, looking for smaller <br />units, cheaper units, the affordability in towns and we're trying to play with what staff <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 25, 2016 Page 8 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.