My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052516
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 052516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:43:02 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:31:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/25/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
wanted which was office, office, office. It's zoned office, and I'll fall back on that <br />discussion about the zoning and how that kind of feel fits in or not. <br />So we designed everything and Tim came up with the office building of 900 square feet <br />on the bottom with the three units on top and three houses. <br />We do have two separate driveways so we don't have to make any curb cuts or lose <br />any street parking. There's an Augustine entrance which would enter for the office and <br />the three studios and there's an Old Bernal entrance which would enter for the three <br />houses. We also stepped the houses away from the other house. The driveway on the <br />west side is bordering the house. The neighbors like that. The house is sort of away <br />from them. Then he kind of clustered the houses. <br />Natalie's idea at one point on our third or fourth revision was to stretch the houses out <br />and pull them apart so they're not so close and so they are wider with more space <br />around them and then we decided to make the office look more office -like and more <br />commercial. So Tim kind of tweaked it, pulled it forward, gave it some outside seating in <br />the front, raised the ceiling plates and all of the transom windows made the ceilings <br />higher and kind of turned the building. That got us our magic missing parking spot. So <br />all along we were under the illusion that we nailed the parking and nailed the height. <br />From our last project with Brian Bowers the feedback was to keep it under 30 feet. We <br />heard that loud and clear from everybody. So they are 29'8 ". <br />Tim Ward: 29'10" and I think one is 30' to the peak. <br />Carey: 29'11" are the heights. So we thought we nailed the parking. The parking for our <br />neighbor next door is one space per studio. We're in the Core Area Overlay district <br />which carries through the whole downtown so we share that same right to do cool stuff, <br />core overlay, a little flexibility, but the O zoning kind of clips us a little bit. We're ready to <br />debate that though. We have O zoning and now we need two spaces per studio. So we <br />can have two spaces per two- bedroom, three - bedroom, four - bedroom, five - bedroom. Is <br />it up to seven bedrooms? Is that right? For the apartments? <br />Amos: Yes. <br />Carey: So technically, by right, we could have a seven bedroom apartment on top and <br />we need two spaces. So to me, the zoning and where we're at on this parcel defies <br />common sense if we're trying to do three studios, we're trying to get a new type of <br />housing downtown. For our neighbor he only needs one space which we have. For us, <br />technically because we're in the O zone, we need six spaces but we could put a giant <br />apartment up top of seven bedrooms and would need two spaces, so just kind of a <br />weird twist on the whole examination of the rules and what we have been going through <br />with our research. <br />We still want to stick with the three studios. We'd like to go with the Core Area Overlay <br />district which allows us one space per studio, and I just wanted to jump in on the map. <br />Could you show the map of the downtown again; the purple zones? <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 25, 2016 Page 9 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.