My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052516
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 052516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:43:02 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:31:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/25/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chair Ritter: Could you put up the slide that has the picture of the blue office or the <br />zoning. So basically, just down Main Street is the only office? <br />Amos: Peters Street. <br />Chair Ritter: Peters Street I mean is the only Office and then along Old Stanley it looks <br />like right now. <br />Amos: Peters and Ray Street. If you're looking at those two other purple parcels, that's <br />Ray Street. <br />Chair Ritter: Okay Ray Street. Adam said there is a top 5. Do they want more offices in <br />the downtown? Is that what you're saying? <br />Weinstein: No, it's just the fact that the Office district in the Specific Plan hasn't <br />responded well to market conditions. There was a sense that there was an over - supply <br />of office space, that maybe Office district should be more flexible or less flexible. I <br />mean, depending on who you talk to there are very different opinions. So there is a <br />desire to look at what purpose the Office district serves and that might change in the <br />future. <br />Chair Ritter: And we don't know what the City Hall /Library area would turn into should <br />they move across the street? <br />Weinstein: Not yet. <br />Chair Ritter: They are zoned Office right now, right? <br />Commissioner O'Connor: They are, so I guess that's something I was looking at. If in <br />this analysis the civic center does not stay zoned Office, it would seem bizarre that we <br />would have the other side of the street have a strip of office where there's no other <br />office. <br />Weinstein: Right, exactly. So when we re -look at the DSP, we'll be taking into account <br />other planning efforts in the city and in downtown and most prominently, the Civic <br />Center Master Plan. <br />Commissioner Nagler: If I could just add a quick comment. As part of the Civic <br />Center /Library Task Force deliberations a request was made by City staff and it was <br />answered in the presentation to the task force about potential uses of the current civic <br />center property. It was certainly not definitive and it was no way intended to get a <br />recommendation out of the task force because that is not the task force's place. But, <br />what was interesting about their data was a reflection of what are the current market <br />conditions and what might be appropriate uses based upon where demand exists as <br />opposed to what's sort of perfect urban planning. <br />The idea that there would be offices as part of the current civic center property was <br />suggested by these consultants to not be the highest and best use of the land and the <br />reason for that is they talked about the patterns of office use in Pleasanton and the <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 25, 2016 Page 7 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.