My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 011316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 011316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:27:43 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:19:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Nagler: I agree with you. I think there should be only one access point to the homes off <br />of Dublin Canyon Road. And I don't think those sitting here know if the plan is for three <br />houses how that could be configured, but it is totally configurable. So I think as <br />guidance, I would like the Commission to say there needs to be one access road. <br />Allen: And I'm in complete agreement with one access road and the road should be as <br />far back as possible; the entrance way, and not next to a frontage kind of road. <br />Ritter: Let's next go to landscaping: <br />Is the proposed landscaping and planter depth along Dublin Canyon Road appropriate? <br />Allen: Okay, so I think we should keep the trees on the front and not have the sidewalk <br />so we can retain the trees as screening to the homes and I think that's really critical. <br />And I would like to see, if we have three homes, I would like to see more trees put in the <br />middle section of this property where it's pretty barren on Dublin Canyon Road right now <br />to create even more screening; some trees that would grow large because you know <br />that section in the middle? It's like you can see everything there. It's the corners that are <br />really protected and screened, especially the western corner, so I'd like to see even <br />more screening. <br />O'Connor: So I had originally thought no because I thought all the trees were coming <br />out, but if we can meander the sidewalk so we can maintain those trees, then I'm okay <br />with it adding some additional screening as well. <br />Balch: Yeah, I don't know. I'm thinking of what they're saying but in light of the question, <br />it's kind of like we've gone into a tangent. <br />Ritter: We're on number 3 <br />Balch: No, I see it right in front of me too, that's the whole problem. In terms of the trees <br />I think this is a different issue now because we're talking about the existing oak trees <br />and removing heritage trees and the meandering sidewalk element and not so much the <br />question of the crepe myrtles and the 20 -foot setback because I know we kind of <br />addressed it, so I'll just start with that. <br />Ritter: I'm in favor of keeping it as natural as we can too. So I'll just go onto 4a.: <br />Does the Planning Commission support the proposed building setbacks, building <br />positioning, home designs, massing, number of stories, heights, and colors and <br />materials? <br />Ritter: I like keeping the setback away from Dublin Canyon Road, as close to the creek <br />without interfering with that positioning. I like the design layout. It looks fairly elegant I <br />think for a country setting. I know the neighbor across the street has expressed to the <br />applicant to copy it or keep something similar which I think is a compliment. The number <br />of stories -I think it is appropriate what he has proposed, so I'm pretty easy on that one. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 13, 2016 Page 21 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.