My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 011316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 011316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:27:43 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:19:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Balch: So in theory, if history holds true, reducing the number of homes will probably <br />mean the homes come back a little bit bigger. So assuming that, generally I would like <br />to see rural homes maintain a single level which the applicant has done. I think the <br />massing is fine. I noted as he presented that one was going to be 30 feet and the rest <br />were going to be around 24 -26 feet. I think all of that works from what I get and the <br />screening that's there. So I have no problem with that. Personally, I think the renderings <br />look really nice. The colors blend and so I'm supportive of actually what the applicant <br />has designed and hope they can keep the general design as they look to redesign the <br />project. <br />Nagler: Ditto. <br />O'Connor: I will ditto with the addition that I do expect that if it is three homes they could <br />be larger and if that helps the church; and I don't know who's building them or what's <br />being sold as, but if that helps in getting more revenue for the church, I'm all for that too <br />There's plenty of room to do a larger home than what we have if there's three. <br />Allen: And ditto for me on all of the comments of fellow Commissioners. <br />Nagler: And if I could add, I didn't say but it really is an interesting point that the homes <br />could be larger and the applicant could accept it. <br />O'Connor: I would like to see them single stories. <br />Nagler: Yes, single stories. I agree with that; the rural look. <br />Ritter: Yes, the rural look. The ranch look. All right, 4b.: <br />A visual analysis with photomontages will be required if the project moves forward. Are <br />there any specific viewpoints that should be analyzed? <br />Nagler: I don't know. I think every possible view from every possible angle so that we <br />can get a sense of it. <br />Balch: So I think one of the views or two that we need are specifically from the center <br />point of Dublin Canyon Road looking at the site both on kind of the western and eastern <br />side so that you're basically looking around the bend if you will up and down the street, <br />and I don't know if I'm describing that appropriately, but you know we kind of want to <br />see the rendering showing that the look while driving up or down the road is going to be <br />the rural look. I have to say, if you look to the south and you see the Preserve <br />Community Association's green lawn entrance to their driveway, it really doesn't look <br />rural to me in the City of Pleasanton. That being said, nor does the higher density stuff <br />slightly more to the west. Perhaps it's not a rural look. It doesn't grow in California <br />naturally by the way. So, that being said, that's one viewpoint. The second viewpoint is <br />obviously a straight shot, I'll call it across the view from, I believe, Ms. Young's property <br />would be my read. <br />Allen: So I agree with Commissioner Balch and just the only add would be a bicyclist's <br />view which I think is your point about just the view from someone driving down. But that <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 13, 2016 Page 22 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.