My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111815
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 111815
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:58:07 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:53:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/18/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
architecturally fit with this neighborhood, which is a commercial neighborhood with a lot <br />of high buildings and is very different from side streets that might be on other streets <br />around other areas of the Downtown. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that one other misconception that is heard a lot is that <br />people talk about three -story versus two -story. He pointed out that there are a lot of <br />homes that are two -story that are very close in height and some are even higher than <br />some three -story homes. He stated that the roofs of this project on profile look very low, <br />and there are a lot of two -story homes, his included, that are very close to this height. <br />He noted that the Commission should look at heights and not be too concerned with <br />three -story versus two -story. <br />Chair Allen expressed concern that if too many 35 -foot tall townhouses are built in areas <br />like the Angela row houses that tower over small historical homes in single - family, <br />single -story kind of buildings, they do not fit the character and the principles around the <br />Downtown guidelines. She also clarified that while it is fine to go up to 40 feet high, she <br />did not think that is necessarily what the principles say for residential. She noted that <br />because this is very confusing and has a chance of creating inconsistencies, she would <br />like staff to clarify that in terms of the policy that exists today and the Downtown specific <br />guidelines that say an amendment should be done for residential districts, which this will <br />be; and that 30 feet is the maximum height and what that really means. <br />Ms. Harryman stated that Land Use Policy 15 of the Downtown Specific Plan <br />contemplates the City Council initiating an amendment to limit building height in all <br />residential zoning districts in the Downtown, including future Planned Unit Development <br />Districts, to not more than two stories and not more than 30 feet. She pointed out that <br />this is something that is contemplated to come back and look at. She noted that as has <br />already been discussed tonight, there are at least two projects that were mentioned at <br />over 30 feet high: the building in the adjacent parcel at 31 feet, 8 inches tall, and the <br />Angela row houses at 34 feet, 6 inches tall. She added that even if a ceiling of 30 feet <br />were set, there would probably be some kind of exception language to look at on a <br />case -by -case basis for a location like this, but with the principle of probably not three <br />stories and not higher than 30 feet. <br />Chair Allen noted that the City has not yet executed the amendment, and the <br />amendment does not mean that this point should be ignored. She asked Ms. Harryman <br />to clarify that her reading is that this is the principle and the intent of residential <br />Downtown, and it is in the policy in the Downtown Specific Plan as an important <br />baseline assumption going in. <br />Ms. Harryman replied that the contemplated direction is to avoid three stories and avoid <br />going over 30 feet high, and the Planning Commission tonight articulated why this <br />particular site is different and why it seemed appropriate in this case to go above 30 feet <br />and above two stories. <br />Garage in Front <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that he is fine with this as long as they are nice - looking <br />garages. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 18, 2015 Page 24 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.