My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 111815
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 111815
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:58:07 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:53:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/18/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Nagler stated that he would support four unless a space could be built on <br />the street, and then it would become three. <br />Chair Allen stated that the majority is for three spaces. <br />Buildina Heiaht <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that he is fine with the building height <br />Commissioner Nagler stated that he thinks the building height is perfectly acceptable <br />because, first, just in context, he thinks everyone has indirectly said that this project is <br />exactly the kind of thing the City wants to encourage off of Main Street but continuous to <br />Main Street Downtown because a mixed -use project like this that is well designed and <br />well- crafted fits with the architecture of the Downtown, blends the use of property, <br />brings that kind of stability, good times, bad times, over time to the Downtown core. <br />With respect to the height, he indicated that what matters to him is not only that this is <br />an independent decision, but that there are other relevant decisions that this <br />Commission and prior Commissions and this Council have made for the street and the <br />neighborhood. He stated that most specifically, he is fine okay with the height because <br />of what is behind it; and the fact is, one will not be able to see any difference at all on <br />the height when they back up against one another, so he finds the massing and the <br />height to be completely appropriate to the block. <br />Commissioner O'Connor agreed and added that the current zoning also says they can <br />go up to 40 feet and can put an office building in there as well. <br />Commissioner Nagler stated that he is just trying to respond as a finding, relative to the <br />neighbor saying that the buildings are too tall. He added that they are under the current <br />zoning. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that if the buildings were not there, the house behind it <br />would be visible, which is only one foot shorter. <br />Commissioner Ritter agreed. <br />Chair Allen stated that she struggled with this because even though this is not <br />technically a precedent, other projects coming through this town will be using this and <br />saying that the building height of this specific PUD on this specific site was approved. <br />She noted that the reason she is fine with this is for the same reasons the other <br />Commissioners brought up; the building behind it will be almost the same height. She <br />added that the work that staff and the applicant did on the design just makes it feel a lot <br />smaller and makes it feel not as overpowering, such as the Angela row homes across <br />from Bank of America, which are a little bit taller, just tower over that little historic home, <br />and do not fit the character of the Downtown. She indicated that she did not want the <br />same thing to happen to this site because of the Chamber of Commerce building next <br />door and the house behind it. She noted that if she supports this project, it would be <br />because this is absolutely not a precedent, and in order for her to feel good about a <br />property, it has to totally line up with the next door adjacent neighbors and has to <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 18, 2015 Page 23 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.