PC 111815 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Nagler stated that this is tied to the mixed -use requirement and that he would very much support a condition of approval requiring that the existing structure forever be used as a commercial retail or whatever the allowed uses are for the structure and that the applicant not have the flexibility over time to use it periodically for residential. He added that he also then thinks that implies that the plaza is important for this whole gestalt of the development, and if that is true, then losing one -third of the plaza to create parking in the back is a sacrifice that is not appropriate to the overall plan. He noted that the implication is that the parking would then be off of the street, and it then becomes a question of whether or not there should be a garage door or not. He stated that he thinks the design of the structure is really quite attractive, and staff has obviously considered this at some length and came down with the side of having garage doors that fit the architectural style of the building, so that is fine from his perspective. Commissioner O'Connor stated that putting the garages in the back also takes away the guest parking out in the front, so now there will be more people parking on the street. He suggested that it might help the people across the street if the garage door be one of the fancier looking ones that have the handles that almost look like the old carriage house -type doors that will go with the Mission style. He added that it would contribute to the character in the Downtown. Commissioner Ritter agreed Commissioner Balch stated that he is in line with everyone's comments. He indicated that he prefers this method of two- abreast parking and two- abreast in the driveway than tandem parking because that does not work very well in design and he has personally seen that go very bad. He added that he is supportive of this as it would allow for four, which would not be possible with tandem in any way, shape, or form. Chair Allen stated that she is also supportive of this. She noted that she generally does not like garages in front on a pedestrian street, but it certainly is not a precedent that she would see approving in most developments. Commissioner O'Connor commented that he is glad the garages are pushed back Chair Allen agreed. She stated that she supports it for the same reasons everyone else mentioned that first, she does not want the plaza to be cut out and half the white house; and second, the quality of the door makes a huge difference. She asked the applicant if the photo on the bottom left -hand corner of page A.13 of Exhibit B of the staff report is really a carriage -style garage like what Commissioner O'Connor was recommending. Mr. Bowers said yes. He added that they want the garage doors to be real authentic Spanish style. Commissioner Balch pointed out that there are some other notes in general that do not fit in with the four items for discussion, and he would like to bring them to this part while the Commission is talking about commercial buildings. He indicated that these are kind PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 18, 2015 Page 25 of 34