My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 081215
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 081215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:52:26 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:43:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/12/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Weinstein replied that he just found out about it late in the afternoon. He stated that <br />it is a condition that was inadvertently inserted; there is no bus route in this location, and <br />the shelter should go away. He indicated that staff would remove it when the project <br />advances. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that the applicants also brought up Condition No. 49. <br />He noted that this is also on one of their other sites and the Commission actually <br />allowed the gate to stay. He further noted that it was not a locked gate, but it was not <br />like an open invitation for everybody to run through the neighborhood; it gives some <br />privacy but one can go through. <br />Chair Allen stated that she is fine with that. <br />The Commissioners stated that they were fine with it <br />Mr. Beaudin proposed two changes to the condition: that it would remain open to the <br />public, and unlocked rather than eliminated." <br />Chair Allen agreed. <br />Mr. Beaudin stated that the other condition that might be appropriate for the <br />Commission to consider this evening is related to a shared parking agreement or <br />something that formalizes the arrangement for the neighboring Gardens senior <br />apartment project, confirming that the number and location of assigned parking spaces <br />would be reviewed and approved by the City, and then ultimately recorded with the <br />County as a deed restriction so that the agreement runs with the land, such that if there <br />is an expansion effort in the future, the future school operator does not have the <br />opportunity to cut off that arrangement. He noted that 13 spaces are shown on the <br />plans, so that would be the arrangement that the Planning Commission has been shown <br />this evening and would be recommended be locked into an agreement as part of this <br />motion as it goes forward to Council. <br />Chair Allen stated that it makes sense to her. <br />Commissioner Piper agreed. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if staff is not going to look at that parking requirement <br />any further. <br />Mr. Beaudin replied that it is on the list of items that staff can certainly work on with the <br />applicant to do some additional study as this moves forward. He indicated that he is not <br />sure that there will be 13 spaces or more or less, but the concern is that 13 spaces are <br />on the table this evening. He added that he is not sure where more spaces would be <br />generated on this site other than the removal of lots. He noted that staff would look into <br />it but would want to formalize it by the time the project got to the Council. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 12, 2015 Page 26 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.