Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Nagler stated that he wants to encourage potentially that it be part of a <br />conversation about how to incrementally change things; if that is the approved future <br />building, it may not need to be where it is exactly approved to be. He indicated that this <br />is a reconfigured neighborhood, but if it is potentially in a different place and the <br />Commission is looking at how to add an amenity and parking, there may be a way to put <br />that in the mix of what ends up being regulation. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that when the school wants to expand, the applicants <br />will have to make their plan which will be reviewed by staff, followed by the traffic study; <br />it is all rolled into one. <br />Commissioner Nagler commented that it is just whether that is the envelope. <br />6. Significantly enhanced amenity. <br />Commissioner Piper noted that doing something significantly more than what they are <br />doing now may be about a redesign and losing lots. <br />Chair Allen asked to brainstorm what an amenity could be aside from what was already <br />discussed. <br />Commissioner O'Connor stated that staff is hoping for something passive that will draw <br />a lot of people to a gathering. He indicated that he was thinking of an additional green <br />space. He noted that there are two neighborhoods here that the Commission is trying <br />to tie together. He suggested an additional interior green space between the homes, a <br />seating area, picnic benches, something that will get the residents in there. <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that he heard the applicant say that they had some ideas for <br />an additional amenity. <br />Mr. Weinstein stated that he would not recommend something like a pool as they are <br />expensive and also use a lot of water and would probably not be appropriate in a <br />drought. He indicated that the options are endless, and amenities are approached <br />through the prism of personal experiences so what one prefers might be different from <br />what someone else prefers. He noted that it could be a community garden, a bocce ball <br />court, a horseshoe court, more passive open space, a par course. He stated that <br />something that involves some sort of open space that is added to the City's current <br />supply of open space would be good, and the key objective is looking for something that <br />would make life in this neighborhood better for residents within and outside of the <br />project site. <br />Commissioner Piper referred to Condition No. 60 and asked if that is something that can <br />be removed. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 12, 2015 Page 25 of 34 <br />