PC 081215 - Laserfiche WebLink

approval or denial, and the applicants can revise their application and make it even better like that other project. Chair Allen stated that she is not yet proposing a continuance and would like to poll each of the Commissioners. She indicated that she is feeling wanting a continuance because she would rather have things worked out in advance and be done thoughtfully, and she thinks that is the way to get the best outcome and the best project if it comes back to the Commission. She added that if everyone knows that the project is going to come back to the Commission, it will need to meet that acid test. Commissioner O'Connor stated that he would like to ask the applicant, should the Commission have a continuance, how long it would take for them to revise the project based on what the Commission wants to see, and come back to the Commission. Ms. Hardy replied that she would like to hear Commissioner O'Connor summarize the issues so they have a full understanding of the Commission's direction. She added, however, that should they agree to a continuance rather than ask the Planning Commission to make a decision tonight, they would want to have that continuance to an absolute date certain, and ideally it would be at the next Planning Commission meeting. She indicated that she realizes that does not leave staff with a whole lot of time, but they are under a timeframe and, in addition to the Commission, they need to go to the City Council. Commissioner O'Connor asked Chair Allen to go through what she summarized of the concerns mentioned and the few she added, and then see who among the Commissioners were in agreement. Chair Allen summarized the concerns as follows: 1. Density, including reducing the FAR from 69 percent to 56 percent. Chair Allen asked what that means in terms of reduction of units. Mr. Schroeder replied that going to a 5,500- square -foot lot as previously suggested would reduce the project to 18 units, and that would make the project infeasible. He explained that when this project came to Ponderosa, the Church was in a dire situation and they had to make a change. He stated that the Church representatives could have gone out to the market to anybody, and a lot of people would have paid a lot more money for this site than Ponderosa could, but they came to Ponderosa because they knew what Ponderosa could probably do here. Mr. Schroeder stated that this site, which is next to a three -story apartment project, a four -lane divided road, an industrial site, and the Operations Services Center, really wants to be denser than this 27 -lot project, but Ponderosa thought that would not work and was not really practical. He noted that they did the Ivy Lane project on Stanley Boulevard, and that worked. He indicated that they laid out the site and thought they PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 12, 2015 Page 20 of 34