My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 081215
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 081215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:52:26 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:43:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/12/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
could make an offer that would work for the Church. He pointed out that if the Church <br />went out to the market, it would be a denser project. <br />Mr. Schroeder stated that they worked extensively with staff on the site plan — the <br />number of units, the architecture, and all the aspects of this project — and they gave <br />about as much as they could and still make it work for the Church to meet their fine <br />print. He indicated that if the Commission wants to make that kind of change, it is not <br />going to work and kills the project. <br />Chair Allen asked how many units would work if it were to be reduced to some number. <br />Mr. Schroeder asked Chair Allen to make him an offer and give him an opportunity to do <br />a little tweaking. He stated that they have already lost two to three lots in the process of <br />working with staff so there is not much room left to move. <br />Commissioner Nagler asked what changes were made that caused those two or three <br />lots to be lost. <br />Mr. Schroeder replied that when the original project was submitted, it was a 24 -unit <br />apartment project where the six lots are, and when they tried to add market -rate units to <br />the apartment site, it was going to be a 47 -lot project with the apartments. He stated <br />that subsequently, with the apartment market, the cost to build apartment units, and <br />when the market heard that the product was for seniors, and the rent was not the same <br />as the market rate overall, they realized they could not make it work financially and <br />switched gears, coming up with a new site plan with those same small lots from the <br />21 -lot side and adding them into the six -lot side. He indicated that they went through <br />various ideas on how to do that, worked with staff, and came out with a plan that they <br />thought worked really well. He noted that they were struggling with the parking lot and <br />originally had their entrance off of the parking lot, which they changed and were able to <br />make it work. <br />Mr. Schroeder stated that they have done a lot of work on this and that they are just at <br />the end of where they can go with this. He further stated that there may be a little <br />tweaking here and there, but it is not going to be a significant change like the <br />Commission is suggesting because it is just not going to work. He indicated that the <br />Church is in a contract to purchase another property, and if they are not able to make a <br />significant deposit, they may lose out on the opportunity to buy that building. He noted <br />that they hate to be in this position and to put anybody in this kind of position, but they <br />have worked with staff and have reached agreements on a lot of these things that are <br />now an issue again, such as the FAR issue, which was a done deal in a meeting with <br />Brian Dolan and Mr. Weinstein, with the additional site plan change from the apartments <br />to houses. He added that they have enhanced the architecture above what they had <br />over at Ivy Lane, and there is a wall all the way around that hammerhead with <br />landscaping so that the hammerhead will not be visible. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 12, 2015 Page 21 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.