Laserfiche WebLink
Chair Allen stated that what she is hearing is that the Commission wants to give staff <br />the flexibility to try and maintain the view while retaining the goals of the applicant, with <br />the option of potentially swapping a parking spot, and the concept of moving the first <br />building from a single -story to a two -story with a good nice design. <br />Mr. Weinstein advised that it would be good to establish some sort of timeline as well. <br />Commissioner Balch proposed 60 or 90 days. <br />Commissioner O'Connor agreed that would give the applicant sufficient time to work <br />with staff. <br />Mr. Weinstein replied that 90 days might be appropriate. <br />Commissioner Balch moved to continue Case P15 -0290 and directed the <br />applicant to work with staff to address the neighbors' view concerns and to bring <br />back the proposal to the Planning Commission within 90 days. <br />Commissioner O'Connor seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Allen, Balch, Nagler, O'Connor, Piper and Ritter <br />NOES: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />RECUSED: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW /ACTION /INFORMATION <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br />Downtown Parking <br />Commissioner Balch stated that at a recent Commission meeting when the Downtown <br />parking survey or the Downtown parking element was brought up, he had asked when <br />the last time was that staff did the survey, and staff had replied that it was getting a little <br />long in the history. He asked the Commissioners if they would support asking staff to <br />re- conduct a Downtown parking survey. <br />Mr. Weinstein explained that it would need to be a City Council priority and that it is still <br />something the Commission could recommend to the Council as a priority. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 22, 2015 Page 11 of 15 <br />