My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 032515
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
PC 032515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:46:08 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 4:28:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/25/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
be reasonable to make it a condition of construction that if, somehow, the construction <br />did damage to this private road, the applicant would be responsible for the repair of the <br />road to protect the road ownership interest of the other three property owners. <br />Chair Allen inquired if that is something that could be added as a condition. <br />Ms. Wallis stated that it was brought up by the Engineering Division to ask for some <br />type of initial baseline measure to determine where it is now and added that it is <br />something the Commission could discuss including. <br />Chair Allen inquired if the applicant would pay for the baseline measure. <br />Ms. Harryman replied that she is not certain the City could do that. She stated that if <br />the Commission were inclined to include something like that, her preference would be to <br />say "If it is determined if that could be done." She indicated that she would like to have <br />more time to consider this because she did not think the City can do that because it is a <br />private road, and their construction vehicles could knock down ten trees on the way in. <br />She stated that she thinks the City could probably condition it to say that construction <br />parking must stay on the property and not be parked on the private road, but the <br />condition of the road is a private matter that the City cannot condition. <br />Commissioner O'Connor added that it can also get sticky as the damage could have <br />been due to when somebody else's pool or home was constructed. He noted that when <br />he was looking at the property, it looked to him like there was a lot of water damage on <br />the road in front of the other three homes, and he was not sure they maintained this <br />road 25 percent regardless of whose water did the damage. He asked staff if there is a <br />condition about construction traffic staying out there, or if there is no parking sign posted <br />on that road even though it is private. <br />Ms. Wallis replied that there is none posted to her knowledge and that she is not sure <br />how that would be possible since it is a private street. <br />Mr. Weinstein stated that there is a sign on Amber Lane that prohibits parking and that <br />he believes that is intended to extend all the way up. <br />Commissioner Piper asked Commissioner O'Connor if his intention is that vehicles be <br />parked on this hammerhead which is part of the private road. <br />Commissioner O'Connor said no; there is ample parking on the property on the 20 -foot <br />setback around the building, plus the owner's driveway. <br />Chair Allen asked staff if that condition is currently included as it sounds like all the <br />Commissioners appear to think that it makes sense. <br />Ms. Wallis said no. <br />Commissioner O'Connor commented that if that is the biggest concern, he is sure it <br />would be amenable to the owners. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 25, 2015 Page 23 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.